Remove "funny" rating.

[Justis]

Am I the only one that's noticed that the "funny" rating is seldom ever used to actually acknowledge humor?
For the most part, that "funny" rating is only ever used to mock and patronize people whose opinions counter your own.
This is already against the rules.
Recently, a post has been made suggesting banning shitposters.

I've been subjected to quite a lot of those guys, personally, but seeing as they were all getting shit on... I played devil's advocate and defended them (the best I could) (hard to defend trash, but I did, and was quite passionate about it)

And every single time that I make a point against the people shitting on the shitposters.
I get that notification "Hahahahaaha".

It's immature, it's condescending and disrespectful...

Maybe even more so than shitposting.
All y'all are a bunch of hypocritics.

-drops the mic-

 

[Justis]

7/9 ratings are supposed to be sarcastic. Only like and agree are actually sincere. Informative is used to mean "no shit sherlock", winner is used to mean "we've got a real winner over here." etc. Changing one rating to make sense won't solve the problem because so many are stupid. It's not some fucking accident most of the ratings can be used sarcastically, it's on purpose. Look at optimistic, wtf is that? There's never been a time to use that one in a positive way. So yeah, I think the easiest way to fix the rating system is to remove like and agree so then the ratings are consistent. The higher rating you have the more of an asshole you are.

I would disagree.
I've used every single one of those ratings in a serious context.
(Though optimistic, is by nature, condescending)

But that was very funny, creative, useful, optimistic, and informative of you.
You're a real winner.
</not-sarcasm-sarcasm>
</sarcasm-ception>

 

[Justis]

*rates funny

BANNED

 

[Style]

Congratz on 19 funny ratings!

 

[Justis]

Congratz on 19 funny ratings!

...
-_-
haha..

 

[tjrgg]

At this point, the "Funny" rating will not be removed.