Ability to choose gradient way (read first)

[kag]

Maybe be able to make your gradient either go lighter to darker or, from darker to lighter, would be a good addition especially because we paid $25 for this.

 

[kag]

Better than your last idea. No offense

what was the purpose of that other than to offend me?

 

[kag]

To remind you not to make another suggestion like thst again. Take it as constructive critism, and thank me for it.

I am not thanking you for a useless comment that had no place in this suggestion. It wasn't constructive at all.

 

[BOOP]

No offense, but like it seems like have your suggestions are spam-y. Please just stop.. they're either really useless and have no reason to implement, or they'd just waste time by implementing them.

 

[Choo]

I would use my purple gradient again if this is implemented

 

[Ally]

The gradients were part of a charity event - that is why we paid $25, not for customisation.

Also, there's no point to the suggestion. The gradients were advertised as-is, I would just stick with them as they are.

 

[Hitoo]

smh

 

[User]

what was the purpose of that other than to offend me?

to inform you he agrees with this idea and believes you are getting better at making suggestions, which i suppose is a compliment

 

[kag]

to inform you he agrees with this idea and believes you are getting better at making suggestions, which i suppose is a compliment

No it was a complete dig at my last suggestion.[DOUBLEPOST=1549463412][/DOUBLEPOST]

No offense, but like it seems like have your suggestions are spam-y. Please just stop.. they're either really useless and have no reason to implement, or they'd just waste time by implementing them.

They are my suggestions and I am allowed to suggest them if I want to.

 

[User]

No it was a complete dig at my last suggestion.

it doesn't seem to be getting much support, so it's not like it was unexpected for him to dislike it
and he didn't even say the other one was bad in the original post, just that this one was better.

 

[kag]

The gradients were part of a charity event - that is why we paid $25, not for customisation.

Also, there's no point to the suggestion. The gradients were advertised as-is, I would just stick with them as they are.

I am not saying I misread the advertisement I am saying it would be a nice addition to be able to do this to your gradients.[DOUBLEPOST=1549463498][/DOUBLEPOST]

it doesn't seem to be getting much support, so it's not like it was unexpected for him to dislike it
and he didn't even say the other one was bad in the original post, just that this one was better.

Yes but bringing it up in a completely different suggestion was pointless.

 

[User]

I am not saying I misread the advertisement I am saying it would be a nice addition to be able to do this to your gradients.[DOUBLEPOST=1549463498][/DOUBLEPOST]
Yes but bringing it up in a completely different suggestion was pointless.

:shrug:

 

[kag]

Nothing better than people getting mad at me so they take it out by disagreeing my thread.[DOUBLEPOST=1549504767][/DOUBLEPOST]Want to point out the reason why Extendedly disagreed my thread (and my post) is because he has nothing else better to say in a different argument on a completely different thread.[DOUBLEPOST=1549504772][/DOUBLEPOST]https://gyazo.com/9ba1141bf6c11d0cf04e73226a483b7d

 

[Mick]

I don't think that there is any benefit to adding this, it just seems like us adding customisation that isn't necessary.

Denied, thanks.