Affixes Multiple Cases of Fraud and Scamming | Do not censor

[Jesse]

Can you explain everything else as well?


Instead of being like this, take responsibility and step down from your position.

I sure can.

Dragoncraft: Was advertising on my thread. Said messages were removed and the user was punished as I have suggested in the MC-Market staff chat. You sent me an email, I laughed after your blatant attempt of hurting my business, and forwarded it to somebody in my TS channel to joke around with. Surely enough you shouldn't have taken it seriously.

Mason: Well... This has been covered before. I can't be held accountable for unproven statements and have posted my response here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qmYzpDM5OZVWprlISw16VlESom4IJqrksddH9lsHmfc

 

[Aschorren]

You're right that it is a very unfair expectation to expect everyone who browses this thread to peruse through weeks of chat logs. If there was something in particular you wished to highlight, you should have pasted that individually instead of expecting people to read a novel of logs. You're pasting our entire conversation in order to look innocent when in reality you've just proved me correct by giving interested parties enough evidence to see your truly guilty nature.

Presenting chat logs does not make you innocent nor does it justify your recent illegal and immoral federally illegal actions. I've been pasted five different logs from five different users in the last two hours of you using sensitive data obtained from your system administrative position here on MCM to initiate federally illegal denial of service attacks on MCM community members.

It truly speaks to your character that within a very short time frame that over 10 very brave people spoke out against you in hopes of receiving justice and fair treatment for themselves and for the community.

Part of being professional includes integrity and speaking up about wrongdoing when no one else in a community dares to.

And now for my response….

Almost 2,5 months earlier, I was contacted by Thomas after already having talked to him for a good period of time. As stated, he was looking for an economy fix for his now-sold server, OP Jails. I told him I wasn’t interested, however as stated by Thomas previously, he continued to almost urge me to look into his issue.

We agreed on a steep price of $350. Certainly ridiculous for an issue that could have a rather simple solution. However, it was surely not something I was interested in doing. Thomas expected me to get started the same day (ar rather, as “close to immediately as possible”), however told him I couldn’t make it happen as my schedule was absolutely full that day. Besides, I was in class at the time this conversation went on and barely had any time to respond.

The next day, I told him I would pass on the offer as I had no time to look deeply into his issue, nor was I interested in it at all. Thomas then continued to urge me looking into this issue (Surely a good business practice), which looked something along the lines of…

He continued offering to adjust the timeframe, extending it to later that weekend. This worked with me, as I could finish off the heavy workload I had on other projects.

The next day (Friday), I continued communicating with him in an attempt to work out a solution. At the time, I had not looked deeply into his server structure yet (Heck, the deadline was Sunday), and thus offered him a couple rough ideas. Unfortunately, all of these had somewhat of a catch and couldn’t be implemented properly into the server.

After talking with him for a good 40 minutes, I told him I wanted to pick up on the matter tomorrow (Saturday) as it was late at night and would prefer going to sleep instead.

The next morning, I woke up to him saying he’d like to be refunded if we did not come to a solution (He paid 50% of the full payment, as I requested), which I found outrageous seeing I still spent time communicating with him and working out a solution.

Being very desperate at first in getting me on his request, his mind seemed to have turned around completely and suddenly he wanted his money back as I “wasn’t interested in it all along”. Maybe the fact that I continuously told him I wasn’t, is worth mentioning.

Understandably, this was not something I’d see myself doing seen I spent time working out a (not yet proper) solution. Rather quickly, this turned into an “I’m right, you’re wrong” type of conversation, which I’m not even going to cover.

Chat log: https://chatformat.com/xvEypZva/
Which went on even further: https://chatformat.com/Dvkp6ZVl/

At this point in time, I had indeed not looked into his structure or overall gameplay yet, however as suggested by the logs, did spend time working out a few rough ideas along with communicating them to Thomas. I offered him 50% of his downpayment (aka. $87,50) back, which I actually find to be very reasonable. I then proceeded giving him the partial refund.

After having spoken with a variety of people regarding this situation, I was very confident Thomas was in the wrong here and wanted to make it interesting. I offered him to make a thread in the public domain (aka. What you’re reading right now), and would offer him the other 50% back if people agreed with his side of the story.

This is something I’d like to cover by the way...



Not only wasn’t I paid in full (Thomas sent me a 50% downpayment), I almost instantly responded to his messages at all times. There was no “24 hour delay” - Thomas expected me to jump onto his issue immediately, after which I told him I had no time and even wanted to disregard his request because of it. See: http://files.iptables.sh/89ku2y90gm.png


No days passed, you always received a response, there was no vague “disable the economy” message,.. I’ve covered this several paragraphs above. I can only see you’re taking advantage of the fact people would not be interested in reading the full Skype logs to counter-prove your statements, but I’m going to link them with their exact timestamps anyway: http://paste.affixes.io/ululazejeh.dos.


I remember briefly speaking with Mick over what happened and nothing evolved from it. You were not given 50% back because of that, as you can see from the Skype logs I provided. I don’t see how I am abusing my staff rank in any way what so ever. The business deal we did has absolutely nothing to do with it and was mainly a flaw on your side.

Your post is made up of unproven lies in an attempt to hurt my online reputation, which I therefore deem highly unfortunate. From someone as “professional” as you, I expected a lot different. You are over exaggerating your replies (“I was thrilled that we were beginning to search for a solution together. I figured I had the brains behind Prime MC's … Why worry?”) and are purely putting out false statements, along with your financial position in this website to make people believe your theory.

 

[Aschorren]

Your snippy and arrogant nature isn't very helpful in a time when your character is being questioned.

Taking the offensive does not make the best defense.

I demand a full apology to all of the people you've scammed, exploited, and used denial of service attacks against and a refund to the variety of unhappy customers you've had.

I know for a fact that there is going to be several more pages of horrifying experiences with you since over ten people have come to me in Skype in the last two hours thanking me for my bravery and for standing up to authority.

I sure can.

Dragoncraft: Was advertising on my thread. Said messages were removed and the user was punished as I have suggested in the MC-Market staff chat. You sent me an email, I laughed after your blatant attempt of hurting my business, and forwarded it to somebody in my TS channel to joke around with. Surely enough you shouldn't have taken it seriously.

Mason: Well... This has been covered before. I can't be held accountable for unproven statements and have posted my response here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qmYzpDM5OZVWprlISw16VlESom4IJqrksddH9lsHmfc

 

[Aschorren]

Can you explain the Denial of Service attacks and the federal offense that it holds?

I was sent logs by five different individuals of five different occasions in which Affixes has used denial of service attacks in order to exercise control and dominance over MCM community members.

I'm absolutely shocked and very impressed at all of the brave people who have come forward thus far and encourage others to please come forward if you have an opinion on the subject or have personally shared an experience with Affixes.

 

[Art3mis]

Step down you piece of shit - We do not want garbage like you on our dear community.

 

[Aschorren]

I wasn't even aware of this point yet but I'm not surprised at yet another example of Affixes infringing upon the rules which uphold this community and in turn damaging the community.

I'm still wondering why Affixes was unbanned after he created a McM copy. The owner of the site at the time claimed it to be "Merging". Nothing ended up happening though except for Affixes getting staff. I have no clue why this was done, and he probably wouldn't be staff at the time had the current owner not unbanned him.

 

[Yeti]

"
In the case that we do not come to a solution, it's fair to assume that I'll receive a refund for the first half of the payment, right?
Thomas L. King - 23/10/15 02:21:13
I doubt that that will be the case but I just want to make sure that we're on the same page.
Jesse - 23/10/15 11:17:30
I still spent time on working with you so I think half the payment is rather fair
Thomas L. King - 23/10/15 11:17:43
Right but I'm paying you for a solution, not for your time.
Thomas L. King - 23/10/15 11:17:48
I don't think it's rather fair at all.
Thomas L. King - 23/10/15 11:18:17
I'm not saying that we won't come to a mutual solution but I'm saying that in the case that we don't I'd like a refund.
Jesse - 23/10/15 11:18:39
I could refund like half of the initial payment however that's as far as I'm going
Jesse - 23/10/15 11:18:50
Wether we get to a solution or not, it's all time based for me
"

That's blatant scamming.

 

[Jesse]

You're right that it is a very unfair expectation to expect everyone who browses this thread to peruse through weeks of chat logs. If there was something in particular you wished to highlight, you should have pasted that individually instead of expecting people to read a novel of logs. You're pasting our entire conversation in order to look innocent when in reality you've just proved me correct by giving interested parties enough evidence to see your truly guilty nature.

Presenting chat logs does not make you innocent nor does it justify your recent illegal and immoral federally illegal actions. I've been pasted five different logs from five different users in the last two hours of you using sensitive data obtained from your system administrative position here on MCM to initiate federally illegal denial of service attacks on MCM community members.

It truly speaks to your character that within a very short time frame that over 10 very brave people spoke out against you in hopes of receiving justice and fair treatment for themselves and for the community.

Part of being professional includes integrity and speaking up about wrongdoing when no one else in a community dares to.

If people aren't willing to read the full story, they shouldn't choose a side and just stay out of it. Everything that I wanted to highlight had already been mentioned in my post. I'll just visually post some screenshots as if it makes a difference to what I already proved...

Proof that I always responded to his messages: http://files.iptables.sh/cv9jpaq46h.png
Proof that you paid me 50%, and not in full: http://files.iptables.sh/rsb3185mbr.png
Proof that several days had never passed: Time stamps on: http://paste.affixes.io/ululazejeh.dos

Anything else that you've stated are pure lies as I proved in my previous response. You can't just throw out unsubstained claims and expect everyone to believe it. I did not take MC-Markets database, I did not activate any denial of service attacks, nor did I do anything else you mentioned. I can only tell you I didn't, as there is nothing to post counter proof of. You haven't even provided anything yourself.

Heck, I could be saying YayMC stores the forum's user passwords in plain texts and leaks them into Adobe's leaked database on HackForums. Would you believe that? I wouldn't, because there's nothing to go with what I'm saying that makes the story look & feel genuine. Rich wording doesn't get you anywhere.

You actually haven't provided proof on any occasion.

 

[Ajdin]

People have high expectations for a staff member such as Jesse. These expectations have not been met, and Affixes should step down.

Mick Are you seriously ignoring this subject?

Take action.

If ANYONE has something else to say about Jesse good or bad, please come forward to open up a path to a better community.

Calm your fingers on your keyboard. Mick is sleeping.

I'm investigating the matter. Please don't unleash your anger on other staff members.

 

[Aschorren]

He's clearly a manipulative and fraudulent individual.

"
In the case that we do not come to a solution, it's fair to assume that I'll receive a refund for the first half of the payment, right?
Thomas L. King - 23/10/15 02:21:13
I doubt that that will be the case but I just want to make sure that we're on the same page.
Jesse - 23/10/15 11:17:30
I still spent time on working with you so I think half the payment is rather fair
Thomas L. King - 23/10/15 11:17:43
Right but I'm paying you for a solution, not for your time.
Thomas L. King - 23/10/15 11:17:48
I don't think it's rather fair at all.
Thomas L. King - 23/10/15 11:18:17
I'm not saying that we won't come to a mutual solution but I'm saying that in the case that we don't I'd like a refund.
Jesse - 23/10/15 11:18:39
I could refund like half of the initial payment however that's as far as I'm going
Jesse - 23/10/15 11:18:50
Wether we get to a solution or not, it's all time based for me
"

That's blatant scamming.

 

[Aschorren]

I was asked to not post the images and logs of you using denial of service attacks to take down other MCM user's internet connections but I have no problem doing so to proper authority figures such as BeBosny after receiving approval from my sources.

If people aren't willing to read the full story, they shouldn't choose a side and just stay out of it. Everything that I wanted to highlight had already been mentioned in my post. I'll just visually post some screenshots as if it makes a difference to what I already proved...

Proof that I always responded to his messages: http://files.iptables.sh/cv9jpaq46h.png
Proof that you paid me 50%, and not in full: http://files.iptables.sh/rsb3185mbr.png
Proof that several days had never passed: Time stamps on: http://paste.affixes.io/ululazejeh.dos

Anything else that you've stated are pure lies as I proved in my previous response. You can't just throw out unsubstained claims and expect everyone to believe it. I did not take MC-Markets database, I did not activate any denial of service attacks, nor did I do anything else you mentioned. I can only tell you I didn't do, there is nothing to post counter proof of as you haven't even provided anything yourself.

Heck, I could be saying YayMC stores the forum's user passwords in plain texts and leaks them into Adobe's leaked database on HackForums. Would you believe that? I wouldn't, because you provided no proof.

You actually haven't provided proof on any occasion.

 

[Jesse]

I was asked to not post the images and logs of you using denial of service attacks to take down other MCM user's internet connections but I have no problem doing so to proper authority figures such as BeBosny after receiving approval from my sources.

Yeah, your sysadmin told me not to post the leaked database of YayMC storing passwords in plain text either. Allow me to up my Photoshop though, as I'm willing to post it to proper authority figures.