Alerting's PayPal to Cashapp Exchange - Only 1% fee! [REPUTABLES]

Jasmine T3 Sub

Chancellor of the Supreme
Banned
Feedback score
11
Posts
468
Reactions
301
Resources
0
heya, title says all, contact me via mcm!
 
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.

spread

Supreme
Feedback score
1
Posts
205
Reactions
67
Resources
0
25*1.01=28. :unsure: On another note, vouch for Jasmine T3 Sub dealt with before would recommend.
bro 25*1.1 is not even 28[DOUBLEPOST=1605391288][/DOUBLEPOST]
m yguy has 0 rep and has a SR open not boutta take a risk for lower
Bro, thats a scam either way not trynna flame ya, but advertising 1% fee and giving something thats not 1% is kinda on the line for scamming
 

Jasmine T3 Sub

Chancellor of the Supreme
Banned
Feedback score
11
Posts
468
Reactions
301
Resources
0
bro 25*1.1 is not even 28[DOUBLEPOST=1605391288][/DOUBLEPOST]
Bro, thats a scam either way not trynna flame ya, but advertising 1% fee and giving something thats not 1% is kinda on the line for scamming
alright try taking somethign that c an be easily chargebacked on, and giving someone else something that cant be charged back, all while them having 0 rep and a SR. Thanks for the tip though i'll edit my title ;)
 
Banned forever. Reason: Rules violations

spread

Supreme
Feedback score
1
Posts
205
Reactions
67
Resources
0
alright try taking somethign that c an be easily chargebacked on, and giving someone else something that cant be charged back, all while them having 0 rep and a SR. Thanks for the tip though i'll edit my title ;)
man i was messing with ya, its not a scam, he asked for how much and you answered with a price, he could have asked if its 1% or not lol.
 

RiznSun

Full-Stack Software Developer
Supreme
Feedback score
11
Posts
234
Reactions
125
Resources
0
So what percent fee is it really?
 

Jasmine T3 Sub

Chancellor of the Supreme
Banned
Feedback score
11
Posts
468
Reactions
301
Resources
0
So what percent fee is it really?
If you're more reputable of I know you personally, the 1%, good luck convincing me to give you the low fee while having a SR.
 
Banned forever. Reason: Rules violations

Jasmine T3 Sub

Chancellor of the Supreme
Banned
Feedback score
11
Posts
468
Reactions
301
Resources
0
I don't get it charging a higher % which is still a low amount won't make a difference if they can still chargeback, if anything you're tempting them to a chargeback for charging them a higher price for not being 'reputable' :rofl:
fairs fairs, tbh it's just a personal point. Technically I'm not getting anything from 1%. Not until PDMC arrives.
 
Banned forever. Reason: Rules violations

Wezel

legend
Supreme
Feedback score
106
Posts
764
Reactions
431
Resources
0
I don't get it charging a higher % which is still a low amount won't make a difference if they can still chargeback, if anything you're tempting them to chargeback for charging them a higher price for not being 'reputable' :rofl:
Its perfectly understandable. You can look at it as a high risk high reward thing. Dealing with less reputable members implies higher risk than dealing with higher rep members, so it makes perfect sense that the higher reward might follow, if the seller choses to do so.
 

Wezel

legend
Supreme
Feedback score
106
Posts
764
Reactions
431
Resources
0
That's not how it works... increasing it by $3 is shouting out to create a chargeback there's no reward, it was his decision to make a 1% exchange rate, and hasn't mentioned anything in his post to increase it, the title says reputable so you'd expect him to deny anyone that he doesn't seem worthy (which is overrated because a lot of people exit scam), he still chooses to deal with them regarding if scam reports are opened. So no, it's not understandable it's confusing and unfair.
Who are you to say that thats not how it works? If the seller chooses to deal in such a way, he has the fullt right to do so, and its understandable if some sellers want to do just that.
 

Wezel

legend
Supreme
Feedback score
106
Posts
764
Reactions
431
Resources
0
"Dealing with less reputable members implies higher risk than dealing with higher rep members" - No.

It does tho. Take a very active guy on this market with lets say 100+ rep, and xXGamer123Xx that joined yesterday with 0 rep. In whos hands are your money at the highest risk? The guy who just joined, literally done no deals, or have proven any trustworthyness, or the active and reputable lad? Common sense. Anyways, I wont be posting anything more here, no point spamming Jasmine T3 Sub thread.

:)
 
Top