Anthony R Is Trustworthy!

[Anthony R]

Okay, there are many things I need to talk to you all about. I will be taking this one step at a time.

It appears i'm being made out to be untrustworthy because of a video, which I can confirm, is me talking which was taken after my demotion, not before or during the process.

I am addressing ONE fact in this thread, and that is the notion I am untrustworthy. I will be addressing the video and everything else another day. I just do not wish to be accused of being untrustworthy when I am trustworthy!

Firstly, don't forget i've been staff for a while, and Mick will confirm i've never abused my powers or done anything to question my loyalty to this forum.

The trust issue seems to have come from that video. Okay, so let's accept the point I made that the video was taken after my demotion. Why would I wait so long to get back at Mick? I had access to the admin panel, I could have done anything I wanted to. I did not though, and never intended to harm anyone or anything.

Secondly, you might be saying, trust is proven. Here is my trust.

The person who demoted me, I assume Mick, has forgotten to remove all of my perms. I still have shoutbox perms and other perms. Go into the admin panel, go to users (it's the last section of options) and you should see user permissions or something, just check mine and set them all to the grey one, which is not set. So that means I have no perms, only perms given to me by being a user, Premium and Supreme.

Even after my demotion, I could have caused issued on the forums, and I have not as I have not used these perms, and I've been waiting to post this thread to prove I am trustworthy.

Also, I have perms on TS too, I could do whatever I like on there too. Anyone who has TS will see I have done nothing on TS. Remember, I have a phone and PC, demote me from both, not just one.

I'm even helping you take the perms away. I don't wish to harm anyone, i'm literally being accused of something which is untrue. Here is proof I still have perms:

Anyway, take away my perms and stop calling me untrustworthy. I have not done anything and I could have done a few things with the other perms I still have other than those, and I have not. I'm not here to cause trouble.

I'll address all the other stuff in my next thread.

Peace and love guys!

 

[Luca]

Why'd you pick me o-o

 

[Magnemite]

106 PMs Anthony? But yeah, TBH id rather have you for owner than B or R.

 

[TellingMom]

This is like Politics...

No, It's like drama.

 

[kitcat]

I believe you're trustworthy. But holy shit, 106 PMs?

 

[Sloth]

You should come back now. I don't even fully know who's in charge anymore and you seem to be the most trustworthy out of any of them nowadays

 

[Renovix]

I wasn't aware until now of this - but I had thought that Anthony was the most trustworthy of all the staff. I'm surprised.

 

[theunnamedgamer]

MCM has a teamspeak?

 

[Future]

we need verringer back that dude was chill af

 

[Overlord]

I feel like replying to this, even though I aware I'm 7 days late to the party.

I never really liked you. I think you're clueless, not really in any scenario legitimate in your field, your changes to the scam reports system and its endorsement was stupid, I also don't think any of your business advice is legitimate.

That said, I feel it's slightly sad that a controversial demotion of someone that put 1,384 posts into helping people (regardless of my belief that it was completely stupid assistance, though people did like it) didn't even receive a page of replies or attention into demotion and action against them.

A quiet demotion is less dramatic, so within reasoning it's more appropriate than an announcement to cause drama. So that's one thing Mick, or whoever demoted you, did right.

Reading this thread, I do think you're too dramatic to be staff anyway. I mean, the foundation of this thread defies your user title and also what's contained within your signature. This is like something I see in a tabloid newspaper. I'd call you innocent, but I doubt that's the right word, so I'll just use some kind of stupidity and ignorance of politics. You should be more than aware your position, your demotion and everything administrative about this site is blatant politics. That isn't necessarily wrong, it's just how it is. So, that being said, you should've expected your position here was expendable.

If you want permissions taken away, contact Mick for correction directly. I mean, this thread was obviously created for some kind of response. I don't blame you for wanting to gain some kind of public attention after being demoted for seemingly nothing after your efforts put into a ruined system, which was to some extent your fault too. Though, I do feel a bit bad for you in the sense that nobody really cared, it would seem.

As far as 'untrustworthy' goes, do you really care what a bunch of pre-teens think about you on a forum aimed towards becoming a replica of hack forums? Also, do you really want your position back on this forum?

Think about those two questions if you wish to reply to me. That's really all you need to take from my message. Do you care, do you want your position back? Think real deep about that.

Additionally:

• I would not support you as staff, but that is irrelevant, I also don't like most existing staff
• I don't think you or Mick is wrong in this scenario, mostly because I don't know enough about it
• AFAIK, you were demoted for releasing screenshots of Mick's deal with Ew, and clear opposition against Mick who is the owner of the site after a paid acquisition, you, being a "business advisor" should know all the details of a business acquisition
• You clearly show opposition against Mick, which isn't constructive in the environment
• I don't know what video you're talking about
• This thread is presented way too dramatically

Anthony R