Anticheat

Status
This thread has been locked.
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.

PhoenixHaven

Feedback score
0
Posts
25
Reactions
13
Resources
0
Well isnt it going to be around AngelX pricing which isnt bad lol. It sells for a little more than vulcan and is a lot better[DOUBLEPOST=1601784328][/DOUBLEPOST]
spot on combat l0LLLL okayyyy. that's as funny as using AngelX
Mind giving us some insight on a working aura/ aimbot/ autoclicker then? Or are you gonna be the same guy in my comments that said he could tpaura on mmc but never proved it?
 

TENE

Feedback score
1
Posts
152
Reactions
57
Resources
0
Mind giving us some insight on a working aura/ aimbot/ autoclicker then? Or are you gonna be the same guy in my comments that said he could tpaura on mmc but never proved it?
Bro, its literally impossible to be "spot on" unless you have constant falses like Vulcan...
 

TENE

Feedback score
1
Posts
152
Reactions
57
Resources
0
+1
but karhu is also shit version wise on 1.12.2[DOUBLEPOST=1601972919][/DOUBLEPOST]
they patched all the verus disables
It's a $15 anticheat its meant for 1.7-1.8 detection's wont be as good on higher versions lol idk what you expect.
 

TENE

Feedback score
1
Posts
152
Reactions
57
Resources
0
except the author mentions it's well tested on 1.8+ ;/ where it false on almost every check the ones it doesn't false on you can blatant hack on e.x it's reach a check
just got to test it only falsed reach about 2 times LOL hardly falses what do you mean
 

PhoenixHaven

Feedback score
0
Posts
25
Reactions
13
Resources
0
just got to test it only falsed reach about 2 times LOL hardly falses what do you mean
1. The spigot API used is 1.13 so idk how you got that it's meant for 1.7-1.8.
2. Both reach checks are unstable which is understandable as frep doesnt want to make too good of an anticheat otherwise there will be a massive demand for leaks or skids. This is also the reason why antikb is pretty easy to bypass.
+1
but karhu is also shit version wise on 1.12.2[DOUBLEPOST=1601972919][/DOUBLEPOST]
they patched all the verus disables
They patch the methods, not the disablers. Once one is patched another will arise in a week or 2 taking it's spot.
 

TENE

Feedback score
1
Posts
152
Reactions
57
Resources
0
1. The spigot API used is 1.13 so idk how you got that it's meant for 1.7-1.8.
2. Both reach checks are unstable which is understandable as frep doesnt want to make too good of an anticheat otherwise there will be a massive demand for leaks or skids. This is also the reason why antikb is pretty easy to bypass.

They patch the methods, not the disablers. Once one is patched another will arise in a week or 2 taking it's spot.
clearly meant for 1.7-1.8 if it advertises it detects 3.1 ;P
 

TENE

Feedback score
1
Posts
152
Reactions
57
Resources
0
So does that mean that Verus is directed at 1.7-1.8 because they can stop 3.2 block reach?
Yup lol. Are you dumb. Good luck detect 3.1 on 1.9+ LOLLOLOLO no one does it.[DOUBLEPOST=1602089661][/DOUBLEPOST]
no verus actually knows what they're doing at works the same for 1.7-1.16
no they dont lol their developers are incompetent and pay Simon to do everything still a shit product and gets bypassed and disabled 24/7
 

Nort721

Security Researcher | Software Engineer
Supreme
Feedback score
0
Posts
61
Reactions
50
Resources
0
This thread has become very big but provide very little amount of actual useful information like most AntiCheat related threads, so I'll just say what has needed to be said from the start,

Simply download LiquidBounce (make sure to always use the latest version), thats the pretty much best client to test AntiCheats with and its very easy to configure

Browse on mcm and spigot and take a look at AntiCheats and put together a list of the anticheats that contain what you need (version compatibility, etc...) and has good reviews, test all of them and choose the one that showed the best results relative to its price tag and thats it!

Peoples opinions can be biased, and are most likely outdated, anticheats are constantly changing after all they are software that is based on research, so why trust what other people say when you can test the product yourself and see live in front of you what it has to offer

Im sure that people are tired to see these kind of useless threads pop up again and again and see the same shit happening, so I'll be galde if someone can just make sure to copy-paste this reply everytime a thread like this pops up
 
Last edited:

Xeify

System Administrator, Developer & Graphics Artist
Supreme
Feedback score
13
Posts
565
Reactions
193
Resources
1
This thread has become very big but provide very little amount of actual useful information like most AntiCheat related threads, so I'll just say what has needed to be said from the start,

Simply download LiquidBounce (make sure to always use the latest version), thats the pretty much best client to test AntiCheats with and its very easy to configure

Browse on mcm and spigot and take a look at AntiCheats and put together a list of the anticheats that contain what you need (version compatibility, etc...) and has good reviews, test all of them and choose the one that showed the best results relative to its price tag and thats it!

Peoples opinions can be biased, and are most likely outdated, anticheats are constantly changing after all they are software that is based on research, so why trust what other people say when you can test the product yourself and see live in front of you what it has to offer

Im sure that people are tired to see these kind of useless threads pop up again and again and see the same shit happening, so I'll be galde if someone can just make sure to copy-paste this reply everytime a thread like this pops up
Here's the thing. Liquid Bounce is free, and popularized so it's going to be patched... You need a real client that actual hackers use otherwise it's not a real test.
 

GladUrBad

Feedback score
0
Posts
30
Reactions
30
Resources
0
Yeah because of shitty developers that can't handle 2nd grade math for fucking aura rotations

I'd like to see you try to flag LB's rotations without false positives. When you think you've got it, ring me up @GladUrBad#0101 and I'll try to false it to hell.

I've got it down myself, and it could be very easy to patch but with a lot of false positives. I've found a way to patch it without false positives.

Try it out yourself, and see how hard it is before you shit talk anticheat developers and a open source client anticheats still hardly detect.
 
Status
This thread has been locked.
Top