Yeah, with no disrespect, because some people don't mind, but for my use, I wouldn't be interested in DC VPN since some services would detect this and block me using services. Residential is much better for alot of people. Count my vote now as not interested.
Wouldn't really be interested in a DC VPN as then I'd just be able to grab a vps and spin one up myself for a similar cost. If you can offer residential IPs, a no bullshit 0 log policy, and a decent amount of DDoS prot, I'd be interested.
Not really. Multiple locations just in VPS would cost you significantly more. The only reason selling it as a service works is because multiple people buy it.[DOUBLEPOST=1536078673][/DOUBLEPOST]
Thank you!
I'm bringing an example, for example, I live in New Jersey, so I'd just a $2.50 or $5 VPS from OVH or vultr and set up an instance for the same price and a guaranteed privacy policy that I can agree with (I run it). You would really be only having a chance to sell it if you offer residentials, really good privacy policy, unlimited bandwith, and good DDoS mitigation. non-residential IP addresses get blocked by the likes of netflix, hulu etc and many other streaming and other services.
It doesn't suck? That's great, you and your information is protected more than it was previously.
I'm assuming you're referring to the GDPR? The GDPR is a huge step in the right (and a bit in the wrong) direction to ensure customer safety, protection, and "respect" online when dealing with corporation. EU citizens have essentially been written a new bill of rights online (not really, but the metaphor sort of fits), giving them the right to increased privacy, responsible disclosure of data breaches, removal of customer data from servers on request and much more. For the most part, the only people who don't benefit from this would be the companies that weren't treating their customers justly in the first place.
