Just because you are a "legal writer" doesn't mean you have to jump to conclusions on what I am saying - The world is judgmental regardless. Everyone has their own opinion, but you've derailed - As you would say, "you have derailed, HORRIBLY". Sorry, that was uncalled for, but I couldn't help it.
Also, as you are a 'legal writer' I have to say your grammar isn't up to the standards of a legal writer - What is your age? Are you still developing as a 'legal writer'?
Now, before you say "Well, your grammar isn't amazing" etc. You have to understand that I am not stating that I am a professional writer, unlike yourself.
Regardless, back onto topic: I completely agree with your point; you cannot compare programming languages. You can only compare one programming language with itself.
You've also attempted to offend me in regards to my programmatic skills. Well, you've made a HORRIBLE mistake (couldn't help using it again). My code is way above average here. There's about 20 competent developer's on this forum, and the rest are beginners or non-competent programmers.
Welp. Some people never learn do they? \_
I'm not going to bother arguing - you just didn't understand the point. Yes, I am a legal writer thank you very much.
I understand that everyone is judgemental - it is a basic human attribute. What I am annoyed at is the fact you think that what you said had any relevance whatsoever to my statement.
My Statement:
This poll is so inaccurate. You can't judge 1amDev against Blasthappy, they work in two different fields, with two different levels of difficulty. Comparing them would be impossible to do to an accurate level.
Smh.
Your reply:
Welcome to the world where everyone is judgmental; you just have to deal with it.
It simply makes no sense. What does everyone being judgemental have to do with being purely unable to compare two different categories.
Not going to make this long - I've learnt not to give attention-seekers attention.
Let me answer some questions though:
What is your age?
Private.
Are you still developing as a 'legal writer'?
I would think not - I am well established, and have worked with many people and businesses.
miss-comprehension
Not a word. Correct word would be: "mis-comprehend".
Also, as you are a 'legal writer' I have to say your grammar isn't up to the standards of a legal writer
My grammar is fine thank you very much.
My code is way above average here.
You are not one to judge that.
That shall be my final reply to this discussion. You can't hold a proper argument, and you constantly fail to give a reply that is appropriate to the discussion. If you would like to carry on embarrassing yourself (horribly) then PM me. Other than that, I hope everyone else understands that this poll is inaccurate.
