Butthurt Reputation

[carstonia]

ok so like basically i don't even care about the evidence requirement anymore. it's retarded how if i give someone a negative rep for telling me to kill myself or making me wait a week just to tell me they don't like my art after i've waited for a week, they can rep me back for literally no reason at all and have no penalty whatsoever nor do staff remove it.

that's some dumb shit

remove people neg repping you back just because they're butthurt

 

[Ivain]

might wanna elaborate a bit. "Remove people negrepping you back just because they're butthurt" is just a tad vague.

 

[carstonia]

might wanna elaborate a bit. "Remove people negrepping you back just because they're butthurt" is just a tad vague.

>remove people falsely handing out negative reputation after you rep them just because they're butthurt.
half the time it's not even true rep but staff don't want to spend their time looking at evidence so they're like ohoho denied[DOUBLEPOST=1521758631][/DOUBLEPOST]

Yeah, because it seems like you get butthurt it if they don't like your art, so wouldn't you be doing what you don't want to happen ?

that's not the point. at all. (nor is it the case in what i mentioned)

 

[John]

i agree 100% but I just want to say that this will be denied, the staff suck, deal with it

 

[Verringer]

100% agree with you here.

I gave somebody a neg rep and they gave me one back and messaged me on Discord offering to remove theirs if I remove mine.

I reported it to staff, they removed his rep and I checked his profile recently and mine has also been removed.

Reputation is useless.

 

[Marth]

You identified the problem, now propose a solution

These threads are useless. false rep has been an issue for ages

 

[SheepeyDarkness]

This is why I never give anyone neg or neutral rep. The only thing I've given was one neutral rep and I removed that in a day. Shame. There needs to be a rule that if you're going to neg someone back the evidence has to be at max 2-3 weeks old. People can find evidence for being toxic for someone from 4 months and and it'd be accepted.

 

[Mick]

If you have a negative experience with someone, chances are they've also had a negative experience with you. This has been suggested several times before and that is the reason why we allow people to "revenge rep". As long as someone provides a substantive reason for why they're leaving rep on you, it's valid at the moment.

In the future when we hopefully implement a proof requirement that will change though. Get hyped.

Denied, thanks for the suggestion.