Data Centre Colocation
- Thread starter woodster
- Start date
-
- Tags
- colocation
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.
15TBps capacity 
You do realize that corero in-line means your datacenter should have at least 15TB/s of bandwidth to offer that? There are networks with world-wide locations that dont even reach 10TB/s of capacity... and you offer that on a single DC? Also to note corero smartwalls are only able to be clustered on 160gbps amounts, so you would need 100 of them which is deffinetly not cheap.
Zare, a very big EU provider has only 160gbps of corero in-line, and your telling me you have 15TB?
You do realize that corero in-line means your datacenter should have at least 15TB/s of bandwidth to offer that? There are networks with world-wide locations that dont even reach 10TB/s of capacity... and you offer that on a single DC? Also to note corero smartwalls are only able to be clustered on 160gbps amounts, so you would need 100 of them which is deffinetly not cheap.
Zare, a very big EU provider has only 160gbps of corero in-line, and your telling me you have 15TB?
Hi,
You do realise that the network upstram were using (GTT) has 15TBps between all their clients which use Correo. Let me know if you have any more further thoughts?
Kind Regards
You do realise that the network upstram were using (GTT) has 15TBps between all their clients which use Correo. Let me know if you have any more further thoughts?
Kind Regards
15TBps capacity
You do realize that corero in-line means your datacenter should have at least 15TB/s of bandwidth to offer that? There are networks with world-wide locations that dont even reach 10TB/s of capacity... and you offer that on a single DC? Also to note corero smartwalls are only able to be clustered on 160gbps amounts, so you would need 100 of them which is deffinetly not cheap.
Zare, a very big EU provider has only 160gbps of corero in-line, and your telling me you have 15TB?
Okay? So your upstream has 15tbps global capacity, that doesnt mean you get all of it to protect your server... and using a provider for ddos protection is not "in-line"
Hi,
You do realise that's very similar to how Path.net operates, and how DDOS figures are quoted. You should understand this as you're literally just reselling Path.net. let me know if you actually have any proper questions or me just telling you how the basic's of how DDOS protection work.
Kind Regards
You do realise that's very similar to how Path.net operates, and how DDOS figures are quoted. You should understand this as you're literally just reselling Path.net. let me know if you actually have any proper questions or me just telling you how the basic's of how DDOS protection work.
Kind Regards
You are advertising "IN-LINE" corero mitigation... Cloud services are something else... Do You not understand what IN-LINE means? Yes your upstream has a network capacity of 15tbps but that isnt used for your server or ddos protection... Thats for all other servers that use them to get access to the internet
Hi,
I understand what you are saying, however if you're not interested in my services please don't waste my time any further with this. I hope for the best of luck for you.
Kind Regards
Just commenting about this so customers arent mislead into buying thinking there is 15tbps of protection on it while it luckily has 10gbps
Hi,
I can assure you and other's that our host network has mitigated multi 100gb attacks before, I don't appreciate this smear campaign your going on. I suggest you do abit of research before commenting next time.
Kind Regards
I can assure you and other's that our host network has mitigated multi 100gb attacks before, I don't appreciate this smear campaign your going on. I suggest you do abit of research before commenting next time.
Kind Regards
I suggest You don't advertise the entire capacity of NTT as your ddos protection
I would suggest you don't advertise the entire protection of path.net in your case then.
Kind Regards
Lol, path.net is a dedicated ddos protection provider, by having them as our upstream they are able to filter attacks up to 17tbit/s to our IPs, GTT has no DDoS protection option and they just have a throughput capacity of 15tbps combined from all their customers, they won't use all of that to your Network or provide remote protection... The actual protection You have is whatever your firewall appliances on the datacenter can handle... Sure if You use corero the datacenter may have 160gbps like zare but im not sure if it's phisically possible to protect a single server with more than 160gbps of corero Smart walls
to comment on this you will be using one of Paths POPs so if someone else is also getting DDOSed on that POP you could go down as well if the attack was big enough and because you're sharing a POP you will never get Paths full protection to yourself
Nope, path network is anycasted so we are using the entirety of PoPs, and yes theres not the full network for ourselves but there isnt really a number of what actual capacity we would have of mitigation, path has mitigated 1.2tbit attacks though and they Say they have 14tbit/s of mitigation capacity so we use that...... On another side GTT doesnt use anycast or any pop, they are a upstream provider and they only give conectivity services, the actual capacity is whatever the guy has hired as a link on his datacenter and that is if he has enough smartwall appliances to handle that
everyone gets access to all the POPs that's the point of an anycast network my point is you will never get the full capacity of Path to yourself as it will always be defending other attacks in addition to yours this is a problem with the entire DDOS protection industry and while I do agree that the DDOS protection figures quoted by Woodster is a lot less realistic then your quote there is not much you can do when the entire industry quotes ridiculously unrealistic numbers there has never been an attack anywhere close to ethier of your quotes
Post automatically merged:
While I do agree that Path is in a whole other league to Coreo that doesn't take away from the fact that it is at least included all the other providers in this price range in the UK have massive compromises such as security / networking I myself am in VeloxServ I can say while the network performance is not fantastic it's good enough. obviously I can't vouch for any Velox reseller so to speak I can vouch for Velox
Last edited:
The issue is that he isnt under a ddos protection service, he's quoting gtts global capacity as his, it is like if You had hired idk Comcast and got a firewall router and just said "umm i have 10tbps of capacity since thats what Comcast has"
Hi,
You're post is interesting and maybe enlightening for certain user's, however the rackspace on power is from veloxserv, our network is not using them however the backup connection is but is rarely used. showing the resilience of our network.
I agree with this statement generally the way Coreo works is using it's available network throughput as a basis for it's protection so while I also agree that Woodster will have quite a bit less then 15TB protection it should be more then enough for most attacks.
What I would suggest to Woodster is going back to Coreo and get a quote based on the capabilities supported by their hardware
Smart walls can handle at most 160gbps per-array (this is what zare has) and that is considering that they also have 160gbps of conectivity
