Discrim.Bid - NOW HIRING!
- Thread starter Burdened
- Start date
- Status
Alrighty, we will get back to you within 2 - 7 days, stay tuned
Thank you!
Thank you
---
Thank you to all the previous people wishing us good luck, it definitely means a lot to us.
We plan to give 1% at first to the top preforming support agent.
EDIT: My mistake, 1 - 5%
Last edited by a moderator:
That is horrible. If you then fail and make 1.00 a month you will be giving 1 cent. Also, you'd be better off doing a base rate, such as " 20.00 a week, or 20.00 a month" as it will make people feel more inclined to apply
Last edited:
That is horrible. Because then if you fail, and make 1.00 a month you will be giving 1 cent. Also, you'd be better off doing a base rate, such as " 20.00 a week, or 20.00 a month" as it will make people feel more inclined to apply
We have the advertising ready, so we are expected to get some sales, and sorry, it was 1 - 5% (it will be split across the agents)[DOUBLEPOST=1514917443][/DOUBLEPOST]
That is horrible. Because then if you fail, and make 1.00 a month you will be giving 1 cent. Also, you'd be better off doing a base rate, such as " 20.00 a week, or 20.00 a month" as it will make people feel more inclined to apply
We're looking mainly for people who want portfolio experience and building up to use in the real world.
FYI there are some problems with your application format(questions/answers).
>13 is basically the same thing as saying "13-18" or "18+". >13 means more than 13, therefore there's no point in that answer.
This isn't much of an error and more like a problem within the application system. You say "list" although there's absolutely no room to either list or type up about the applicant's education. In my application, as you can see, I just said to read my CV which I linked/uploaded.
The asterisk states that the question needs to be answered and is not needed for this question.
You should rather use hours per week rather than hours a day. Nobody can justify how many hours they could put in straight away, and as a recruiter for a staff team, you'll need to state a requirement of hours per week. This layout, in my opinion, shows that you're making people work every single day of the week instead of having shifts.
Lastly, I haven't really used Google Forms before but it's unfitting having to link a resume/CV and rather uploading it to the form. Again, not sure if that's possible, but I do think it's unfitting.
I have published an application form and hopefully, this is useful to you when recruiting others.
EDIT: I don't know what is funny.
>13 is basically the same thing as saying "13-18" or "18+". >13 means more than 13, therefore there's no point in that answer.
This isn't much of an error and more like a problem within the application system. You say "list" although there's absolutely no room to either list or type up about the applicant's education. In my application, as you can see, I just said to read my CV which I linked/uploaded.
The asterisk states that the question needs to be answered and is not needed for this question.
You should rather use hours per week rather than hours a day. Nobody can justify how many hours they could put in straight away, and as a recruiter for a staff team, you'll need to state a requirement of hours per week. This layout, in my opinion, shows that you're making people work every single day of the week instead of having shifts.
Lastly, I haven't really used Google Forms before but it's unfitting having to link a resume/CV and rather uploading it to the form. Again, not sure if that's possible, but I do think it's unfitting.
I have published an application form and hopefully, this is useful to you when recruiting others.
EDIT: I don't know what is funny.
Last edited:
FYI there are some problems with your application format(questions/answers).
>13 is basically the same thing as saying "13-18" or "18+". >13 means more than 13, therefore there's no point in that answer.
This isn't much of an error and more like a problem within the application system. You say "list" although there's absolutely no room to either list or type up about the applicant's education. In my application, as you can see, I just said to read my CV which I linked/uploaded.
The asterisk states that the question needs to be answered and is not needed for this question.
You should rather use hours per week rather than hours a day. Nobody can justify how many hours they could put in straight away, and as a recruiter for a staff team, you'll need to state a requirement of hours per week. This layout, in my opinion, shows that you're making people work every single day of the week instead of having shifts.
Lastly, I haven't really used Google Forms before but it's unfitting having to link a resume/CV and rather uploading it to the form. Again, not sure if that's possible, but I do think it's unfitting.
I have published an application form and hopefully, this is useful to you when recruiting others.
EDIT: I don't know what is funny.
Thank you for letting us know, We will definitely fix those errors, we will be asking in depth on the interview, this is to help get you introduced to our manager and building a first impression. The interview of course will have many more questions and will challenge you as an applicant.
Will the interviews be done via a voice chat or a group text-chatroom?
The first will be in a text group chat, the second one will be a voice interview.
Sweet. Let me know if I go through the next process. Thanks for answering my questions and accepting my feedback for your form.
No problem, I hope to see you on the team shortly some time soon![DOUBLEPOST=1514934523][/DOUBLEPOST]We have already emailed the first 16 applicants! We are still accepting applicants, don't waste a single moment!
Last edited by a moderator:
I haven't received an email.
- Status
