Don't close threads which are LEGITIMATE.

Status

Samuel

The most serious person ever.
Supreme
Feedback score
33
Posts
2,210
Reactions
1,572
Resources
0
http://www.mc-market.org/threads/166202/#post-1722871

That was a LEGITIMATE suggestion. I didn't ask for things to be removed. Mick, you told me to suggest rule changes or whatever here. That is EXACTLY what I am fucking doing.

I am suggesting 3 points be reduced to 1 point when there is little to no activity in chat if someone spams there.
 
Type
Suggestion
Status
Denied
Last edited:
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.

Samuel

The most serious person ever.
Supreme
Feedback score
33
Posts
2,210
Reactions
1,572
Resources
0
As "legitimate" as it may have been, it got denied. Hence it also got put away in the dark dungeon of the declined suggestions subforum.
It got denied before anyone had chance to give their input. It wasn't a serious denial, he was just saltier than I am about the attitude of staff since Bosny got demoted.[DOUBLEPOST=1484748805][/DOUBLEPOST]
It wasn't a serious denial, he was just saltier than I am about the attitude of staff since Bosny got demoted.
My evidence for this is in my OP, where I link to a post that Mick threatens to ban me from here with.
 
Last edited:

Taiga

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Supreme
Feedback score
6
Posts
614
Reactions
984
Resources
0
You are not that important that every staff cares about what you do other then being annoying.

Dont spam, makes it easier for staff to control sb without needing to check activity and isnt that hard if you bother following the rules
 

Ivain

Master Terraformer
Supreme
Feedback score
45
Posts
9,610
Reactions
4,888
Resources
0
I'm sorry but staff are perfectly allowed to close suggestions about rules that will not be changed. It's like suggestions about the reputation or reaction systems: suggestions that will not be implemented no matter what will be closed without discussion.
It should be obvious that spamming will not be allowed even if SB is "low" on activity (meaning few to none active people). It's still spamming, and still fills the archives with meaningless crap.
 

Samuel

The most serious person ever.
Supreme
Feedback score
33
Posts
2,210
Reactions
1,572
Resources
0
I'm sorry but staff are perfectly allowed to close suggestions about rules that will not be changed. It's like suggestions about the reputation or reaction systems: suggestions that will not be implemented no matter what will be closed without discussion.
It should be obvious that spamming will not be allowed even if SB is "low" on activity (meaning few to none active people). It's still spamming, and still fills the archives with meaningless crap.
I wouldn't have mind so much if he didn't add the threat to the end (which suggests he denied it because it was related to something against me).
 
Status
Top