With your grammar I don't blame them for banning you.
No... this isn't known at all. CloudFlare doesn't mask users IPs? Or do you mean sites that are on CloudFlare get there IP masked? That is the whole point... it's not known. It's literally the WHOLE point of CloudFlare.Why do you have to be rude about it? This is a possible issue and you are just saying because their grammar isn't great that that is a reason to ban them.
--
Back on topic,
What exactly do you mean in this suggestion? Cloudflare has been known for masking clients ips without a proper back-end fix, but I am pretty sure MCM has gotten a fix for it.
No... this isn't known at all. CloudFlare doesn't mask users IPs? Or do you mean sites that are on CloudFlare get there IP masked? That is the whole point... it's not known. It's literally the WHOLE point of CloudFlare.
Well, it's a reverse-proxy... so maybe. Although, you sure it masked your IP, and it's not just separate traffic coming from CloudFlare servers?Cloudflare can actually mask a clients ip when connecting to the site. It has happened to me before.
