Out of my own curiosity and because I'm nosy I hover over the scam reports section from time to time.
The system for the claiment or the person being accused to reply to is too short. An example is this thread (bear in mind it seems to be an open and shut case, but seems to serve a good example): https://www.mc-market.org/threads/610451/#post-4627581
The scam reports section is weeks behind and is overfilled with work and the scam resolving system doesn't give enough time to let either side defend themselves if they are innocent (to argument, if either side is guilty then there'll be enough evidence to make a judgement without a time trial).
Once the scam reports are more up-to-date with a database then it's completely reasonable to give two-days timeframe if the scam report warrants a reply.
The system for the claiment or the person being accused to reply to is too short. An example is this thread (bear in mind it seems to be an open and shut case, but seems to serve a good example): https://www.mc-market.org/threads/610451/#post-4627581
The scam reports section is weeks behind and is overfilled with work and the scam resolving system doesn't give enough time to let either side defend themselves if they are innocent (to argument, if either side is guilty then there'll be enough evidence to make a judgement without a time trial).
Once the scam reports are more up-to-date with a database then it's completely reasonable to give two-days timeframe if the scam report warrants a reply.
- Type
- Suggestion
- Status
- Denied
Last edited:
