Force M6gaming to provide a reason when he rejects posts

[avsterbone]

I don't know about you, but I hate it when I spend 5-10 min. writing coherent sentences if not multiple sentences on a scam report and then for no reason the post gets rejected by M6Gaming. I'm sitting there like "wtf dude." Similar to how when your post is approved you get an alert; I am suggesting that if your post gets rejected you get an alert stating your post was rejected with a sentence or two explaining why. Because at this point having your post approved is just about as likely to happen as you winning red on a roulette spin (%50).

 

[M6Gaming]

Perhaps your comments are just unneeded and something I necessarily don't need to solve the actual report.

Why not bother actually messaging someone, I would get around to it shortly either way. Then you can argue all you want how your message was so important and needed.

 

[avsterbone]

Perhaps your comments are just unneeded and something I necessarily don't need to solve the actual report.

Why not bother actually messaging someone, I would get around to it shortly either way. Then you can argue all you want how your message was so important and needed.

I have done that...multiple times. But you just seem to circle jerk in the PM. I tried that method. It didn't work.

 

[M6Gaming]

I have done that...multiple times. But you just seem to circle jerk in the PM. I tried that method. It didn't work.

Or maybe you can't let the answer sink in your mind and feel so sissy about it.

 

[avsterbone]

Or maybe you can't let the answer sink in your mind and feel so sissy about it.

Ok, the way I work when it comes to having answers "sink in" is a very simple process. I will PM you. I will get an answer I don't like. I'll spend countless hours arguing you typing paragraphs of bullshit. I'll wake up the next morning an realize I'm wrong.

In this case if the last step doesn't occur I'm right which is specific to this suggestion. Even after sleeping I still think I'm right.

 

[JJDAHM]

I'd like to see someone provide an actual reason for him not providing a reasoning, besides the extra work.

 

[nara~kavi]

he should spend his time solving scam reports not wasting time doing that.

 

[Ivain]

So basically, have an automated bot that says "this comment is not relevant" ? I've long since figured out what sort of posts are accepted and what aren't. That you guys didn't is your own problem.

 

[Pinball]

Maybe it would be easier if there was just like 5 categories of why your post was rejected and you could just tick a box instead of writing a few sentences about why it was rejected?

 

[Ivain]

Here they are:

1. Your post was not relevant to the report
2. Your post did not contain anything relevant to the report
3. your opinion is not relevant in this report
4. this information is not relevant to the report
5. Scam reports are not there to tell someone how much of a terrible person they are.
   

 

[Ajdin]

For reasons stated above I don't think it's really needed. I go through scam reports several times a day and notice most posts are removed with valid reason.

You're a 3rd party. You're not related to the deal in most cases so I don't see why he needs to tell you why he rejected a post.

Thread archived.