From the people who hated Verringer, I bring you the people who also hate Mick!

Status
This thread has been locked.

chucK_

chucK
Supreme
Feedback score
0
Posts
1,440
Reactions
823
Resources
0





Enjoy! These are the people who continue to say they wanna leave, leave, and come back because they are SUCKERS!

Mick, please continue to run the forum just fine. Thank you for the additions you have added, the one's I never remember getting before and thank you for not caving into people who try to get you to allow them to run MCM.


Just as an addon, Anthony has made it clear that leaking personal conversations is plenty fine. Decide for yourself your opinion.
_________________________________________________________________

My opinions,

Do I think some stuff going on in the back of MC-M may be improper, immoral, etc? Sure. It's always like that. But can you say any of you aren't the same? No, you cannot. You all seem to be mad that Mick won't unban people like Ew, but do you really wanna be part of all the seemingly wrong stuff that was on MC-M? Staff accounts hacked, regular accounts hacked, but you all seem to be mad Mick won't unban him. Now personally, I've talked to Ew and he seems like an alright guy. He's very trustworthy and I like that about him, but I don't agree with the ways he's tried to get unbanned.

Furthermore, some of you seem to think Mick hasn't done anything for MC-M and you might as well have Verringer back. Well, what did Verringer really add to the site? Anything? Anything??? No. From the time I got on MCM in May, I don't remember anything be added until Mick came, when we got some new themes, better rules, more staff, etc. But you all are also salty about staff, probably because the ones of you who are mad wanted it and weren't chosen.

Going on, has Mick honestly done anything wrong? This isn't a democracy, this isn't even a business setup with a board and chairs, this is a solo-run self-ran business. Mick doesn't have to please you all, he doesn't have to bring in players, heck he could honestly turn this into a Bronie site because HE OWNS IT. For some reason, some of you think you have any right to tell Mick how to run MCM and I don't get it.

Before I finish by addressing some major concerns of the community, let me say this. If you all don't like MCM, leave and go to another Minecraft Market, try those out for a change. You'll see nothing but scammers, password cracking owners, and low-user counts. I've heard people complain that MCM peaks at 300, but the only other markets I know of peak at 10. Use your consumer power to show Mick something, don't just complain and expect it to happen, a staple of all you defining the "give-me generation."

Rocket -
Honestly, I didn't know who Rocket was when he got staff. Who knows how he got it, or why, or whatever, all I know is he's done a seemingly fine job handling scam reports and being semi-fast about it. As for him scamming, being the owner of another Minecraft Market, etc., I think Mick should address that straight on. It seems to not be enough for Rocket to say anything, so allow his boss to clear it up.

Updates and features -
I agree some more features should be added. I believe it would be in Mick's best interests in growing the site and retaining users to implement some of the things listed in the suggestions forums, but I'm not saying he has to. If he has ideas himself, I'm looking forward to seeing them.

False bans, locking, deletions -
Nowhere do I understand where this is coming from. Maybe it's because they get deleted too fast or something, but I've never seen a thread that shouldn't have been locked, locked. The same thing goes for the bans. The bans are clearly defined, and unless they have some way of hiding bans off the ban list, then I think they all seem legit bans to me.

Staff -
It's in my personal opinion that the staff are active and do a good job, but it comes across as not being that way due to the staff to user ratio. 5 to 17,000 isn't a great ratio to be honest. I think the only thing that can fix this is more staff. People like Ajdin (even though I may not be a total fan, I respect his opinions and think he would be someone to look for again), Resilience, Skionz (who doesn't even wanna be staff, but would be so good), and many more. There are people in this community who would make great staff members, it's just finding them and putting them in the positions.

If there are any other concerns, I'll add my opinions later.

Regards,
Kenneth J.
 
Last edited:
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.

Tank

Knowledge is power.
Deactivated
Feedback score
20
Posts
1,060
Reactions
549
Resources
0
First
Will be edited when i read
 

drgn

Retired
Supreme
Feedback score
1
Posts
350
Reactions
320
Resources
0
I never hated Verringer. I've known Verringer since 2013, and I was fully supportive of him running this site.

Mick is a different story, though.
 

Art3mis

MC-Market Partner / Associate since Dec 18. 2016
Supreme
Feedback score
0
Posts
277
Reactions
345
Resources
0
They bring a valid point.
 

GardnerGamer

Hi :)
Premium
Feedback score
0
Posts
921
Reactions
387
Resources
0
Hey, i see myself
 

Tank

Knowledge is power.
Deactivated
Feedback score
20
Posts
1,060
Reactions
549
Resources
0
Look at me in the convooo
 

Sloth

Feed Me
Supreme
Feedback score
6
Posts
4,369
Reactions
2,660
Resources
0
You should be allowed to talk to whoever you want and voice your opinion. I really think that Ew and Linux though have done enough harm and should remained banned. As far as your demotion goes I know anger can get the best of people at times.
 

nara~kavi

✿Homework Service✿
Supreme
Feedback score
7
Posts
1,831
Reactions
2,742
Resources
0
How can anyone see Anthony's behavior in either the Skype chat that he was giving out or the logs from the Skype group there and think his behavior is acceptable for a member of staff?

He was being blatantly disrespectful to Mick, his superior, and was refusing to accept Mick's decision on Ew. He then proceeded to leak the contents of that conversation TO Ew, after Mick made it clear that the subject should be dropped and that Anthony should cease contact with Ew.

The very fact that as a member of staff Anthony felt that a rapist (he raped his ex-gf Leah), cracker, ddoser, hacker, etc, someone who had hacked into Mick's gf's personal accounts on many sites, should be unbanned, demonstrates a total lack of capability and intelligence.

Regardless of Anthony's opinions on the matter, he should have simply dropped the subject and listened to Mick. Instead, he continued and continued, and then leaked the conversation to Ew, and then threw a huge hissy fit and said that he wants there to be "anarchy" on MC-Market. And now he's apparently in some Skype group conspiring against the site.

Why anyone likes this guy or thinks he deserves to be staff here after all of this is beyond me.
 

TellingMom

Deactivated
Feedback score
0
Posts
888
Reactions
508
Resources
0
Single-handedly the dumbest thing said in that chat ...

sbhw3os.png


Although I think the site is run poorly at times, it's not a democracy. It's a fucking website owned by one person. At the end of the day, he can do whatever the fuck he wants. Even if it does cause massive blowback, the choices are his prerogative.
 

TellingMom

Deactivated
Feedback score
0
Posts
888
Reactions
508
Resources
0
How can anyone see Anthony's behavior in either the Skype chat that he was giving out or the logs from the Skype group there and think his behavior is acceptable for a member of staff?

Because you can't justify a decision based off their reaction.
 

nara~kavi

✿Homework Service✿
Supreme
Feedback score
7
Posts
1,831
Reactions
2,742
Resources
0
Because you can't justify a decision based off their reaction.

I said in the chat Anthony gave out too. The one he leaked to Ew. He was acting like a petulant child.
 

montyburly

✿Ferret✿
Supreme
Feedback score
1
Posts
1,201
Reactions
2,180
Resources
0
Because you can't justify a decision based off their reaction.
Based off of the way he's acting after the demotion and the fact that he wants a ddoser, doxer, thief, and compromiser to be unbanned it's easy to see why Mick would want him off the staff position. Someone doesn't just instantly change from a level-headed professional "lawyer" to an arrogant immature child over the course of a day, he's obviously always been like this.
 
Status
This thread has been locked.
Top