Gaming Monitor For Cheap

Status
This thread has been locked.

Kavish

deephelp.org
Premium
Feedback score
14
Posts
702
Reactions
396
Resources
0
Hey,
I'm looking for any nice Gaming Monitors under 170$. Looking for 1080p+ with 75Hz, but anything more would be nice. If any of you can suggest something that I can cop on Prime Day that would be amazing.
 
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.

jxhdvn

The Visionary
Supreme
Feedback score
30
Posts
2,480
Reactions
1,282
Resources
0
Depends on the screen (monitor) size. If you want a large/wide monitor you should definitely get 1440p and if you want a normal size monitor 1080p. 144 Hz is basically useless. I have a 144 Hz monitor and I literally have never seen a difference between 60 Hz and 144 Hz. 75 Hz sounds fair, but 60 Hz will do just fine.

I copped a 144Hz 1080p 23" display for $200 last year on black friday fyi.
def go with 144 hz, its worth it over a higher res
You also left out that in order to actually utilize 1440p and 144hz you have to have a system capable of running so. As we're saying that do you have a powerful enough system to run either of those while playing at decent settings on most games? Kavish
 

Kavish

deephelp.org
Premium
Feedback score
14
Posts
702
Reactions
396
Resources
0
You also left out that in order to actually utilize 1440p and 144hz you have to have a system capable of running so. As we're saying that do you have a powerful enough system to run either of those while playing at decent settings on most games? Kavish
Yea, my system can run most games (Rust, Overwatch, CS) at High to maybe Ultra. I'm thinking about the higher Res as I'm using a 60hz monitor and it feels fine.
 

Emazing

Premium
Feedback score
7
Posts
12
Reactions
19
Resources
0
Depends on the screen (monitor) size. If you want a large/wide monitor you should definitely get 1440p and if you want a normal size monitor 1080p. 144 Hz is basically useless. I have a 144 Hz monitor and I literally have never seen a difference between 60 Hz and 144 Hz. 75 Hz sounds fair, but 60 Hz will do just fine.

I copped a 144Hz 1080p 23" display for $200 last year on black friday fyi.

Have you tried moving your mouse on the desktop in a circle and then going to 60hz and doing the same, when I did that it was so obvious.
 

Kavish

deephelp.org
Premium
Feedback score
14
Posts
702
Reactions
396
Resources
0
Have you tried moving your mouse on the desktop in a circle and then going to 60hz and doing the same, when I did that it was so obvious.
Yeah, I tried it on my friend's monitor and there was a slight difference between 60 and 75 hz. I don't hardcore game and I don't play that often so I think I'll try to go with higher res. There were some good Prime day deals but I didn't get any as they weren't cheap enough.
 

Red

Chromatic Polymath
Supreme
Feedback score
34
Posts
1,251
Reactions
632
Resources
0
I’m selling one: https://www.mc-market.org/threads/496594/

If you want refresh, look elsewhere. But if you want resolution and image quality, this puppy is still hard to beat. 2560 by 1600 at 60Hz. This thing shouldn’t be hard to overclock to 75Hz though, and it’s got more than enough passive ventilation to handle that. Let me know if interested.

EDIT: Forgot to mention that it’s the price you want, but shipping’s on top. It will, however, almost certainly look a hell of a lot better than anything Amazon has for the price.
 
Last edited:

Red

Chromatic Polymath
Supreme
Feedback score
34
Posts
1,251
Reactions
632
Resources
0

10CPS

Feedback score
1
Posts
46
Reactions
22
Resources
0
Depends on the screen (monitor) size. If you want a large/wide monitor you should definitely get 1440p and if you want a normal size monitor 1080p. 144 Hz is basically useless. I have a 144 Hz monitor and I literally have never seen a difference between 60 Hz and 144 Hz. 75 Hz sounds fair, but 60 Hz will do just fine.

I copped a 144Hz 1080p 23" display for $200 last year on black friday fyi.
Did you enable 144Hz? Im doubting that you did. Even performing daily tasks like moving a tab or notepad around is much smoother than when I used to use 60hz. Plus 144hz is the best upgrade a gamer can make (who most likely will use low textures anyways to get better frames). Unless youre using this PC for a lot of UHD movies or spreadsheets, 1080p 144hz will suit you better
 

Red

Chromatic Polymath
Supreme
Feedback score
34
Posts
1,251
Reactions
632
Resources
0
Plus 144hz is the best upgrade a gamer can make
This is a myth. I say this as someone who’s debating between buying 144Hz or 5K/6K/8K for my next monitor.

Yes, I’m aware how huge a difference high refresh can make for people playing fast paced games. But the simple fact is, a lot of people don’t play fast paced games. If I’m playing Tomb-Raider with ray-tracing enabled, I’m going to appreciate resolution a lot more than refresh. Heck, even playing PVP in Minecraft vs building with shaders enabled can make resolution more important than refresh.

Point is, it depends on the gamer and the games.
 

10CPS

Feedback score
1
Posts
46
Reactions
22
Resources
0
This is a myth. I say this as someone who’s debating between buying 144Hz or 5K/6K/8K for my next monitor.

Yes, I’m aware how huge a difference high refresh can make for people playing fast paced games. But the simple fact is, a lot of people don’t play fast paced games. If I’m playing Tomb-Raider with ray-tracing enabled, I’m going to appreciate resolution a lot more than refresh. Heck, even playing PVP in Minecraft vs building with shaders enabled can make resolution more important than refresh.

Point is, it depends on the gamer and the games.
The simple question is whether he wants gaming performance, or a better viewing experience. Youre clearly the type who doesnt mind if he has latency from 4k/8k monitors, lower FPS, and lower overall feel in a game. Whats important to you is the graphics and how clean the game can look, even if it doesnt run smoothly. Whereas for me the input time and performance overall is what I value most. I sacrifice some textures in every game I play to get the max fps possible, allowing my 144hz, someday 240hz monitor to really work their magic. When flicking headshots or tracking a target, the smooth updates make it much more possible
 

Red

Chromatic Polymath
Supreme
Feedback score
34
Posts
1,251
Reactions
632
Resources
0
The simple question is whether he wants gaming performance, or a better viewing experience. Youre clearly the type who doesnt mind if he has latency from 4k/8k monitors, lower FPS, and lower overall feel in a game. Whats important to you is the graphics and how clean the game can look, even if it doesnt run smoothly. Whereas for me the input time and performance overall is what I value most. I sacrifice some textures in every game I play to get the max fps possible, allowing my 144hz, someday 240hz monitor to really work their magic. When flicking headshots or tracking a target, the smooth updates make it much more possible
This is very much true. It depends on the individual gamer, what types of games he plays (you won’t find me flicking headshots too often, for example), and what he values in said games.

I thought I’d add to your post and mention that this also applies to average computer use, too. I do most non-gaming tasks on a Mac, and I use a lot of the built in gestures. In that regard, I have a lot to benefit from high-refresh day-to-day because it would make those gesture animations look super slick. If you work with a TON of text however, you may prefer super high-res to make that text as easy to read as possible.

It just really depends. I’m still not sure what I’d prefer. :p
 
Status
This thread has been locked.
Top