Generous Medal changes.

[Donlil Trump]

So in this current medal it says

While most of the people haven't really donated Premium and only gave a name color to another member and got the medal.
I think this should be changed to "Gifted an account upgrade to another member"


usetheagreebutton.com
Ty, .

 

[34010]

So in this current medal it says

While most of the people haven't really donated Premium and only gave a name color to another member and got the medal.
I think this should be changed to "Gifted an account upgrade to another member"


usetheagreebutton.com
Ty, .

I actually gifted a supreme upgrade but whatever

 

[Justis]

The medal isn't given to members who only gifted a name color.
You have to gift someone premium or supreme to get the medal, so I'm not sure where you got your "most people" info, but it's certainly wrong.

 

[Donlil Trump]

The medal isn't given to members who only gifted a name color.
You have to gift someone premium or supreme to get the medal, so I'm not sure where you got your "most people" info, but it's certainly wrong.

I've seen quite a few people around here who got the medal by giving a name color.

 

[ZACK]

I've seen quite a few people around here who got the medal by giving a name color.

Yeah, me too.

 

[Justis]

Yeah, me too.

I've seen quite a few people around here who got the medal by giving a name color.

Such as?
Mick manually gives the medal after a user gifts premium/supreme and makes a support request or messages him with the transaction ID.
It's possible for human error to have occurred and one or two members to have sneakily gotten the medal for just a name color, however, "Most of them" seems incredibly unreasonable and improbable.

Luckily we keep record of all closed support requests, so verifying a member's transaction ID a second time should be no great feat.

 

[Donlil Trump]

Such as?
Mick manually gives the medal after a user gifts premium/supreme and makes a support request or messages him with the transaction ID.
It's possible for human error to have occurred and one or two members to have sneakily gotten the medal for just a name color, however, "Most of them" seems incredibly unreasonable and improbable.

Luckily we keep record of all closed support requests, so verifying a member's transaction ID a second time should be no great feat.

Could be an error, but if its an error why not convert it into a thing?
Meaning Name Colors will get you the medals, or else Mick was aware of the donation amount but he still gave them the medal.

 

[Justis]

Could be an error, but if its an error why not convert it into a thing?
Meaning Name Colors will get you the medals, or else Mick was aware of the donation amount but he still gave them the medal.

Considering countless people have been denied a medal for gifting name colors, not to mention the incredible increase in medals that would have to be given now and in the future, making the medal even less rare than it is now, (and it's already the most common medal), I'd have to disagree with making it a thing.

And I'm fairly sure Mick has never intentionally gone against our own requirements.
I still haven't heard an example of even one user whose received the medal without gifting premium/supreme.

 

[Mick]

I've changed the description now to 'Gifted Premium or Supreme to another member.'.

There's no plan to make it for people that gift name colours though.

Denied, thanks for the suggestion.