Personally, I've seen that the policy that if you don't respond within 24 hours, you automatically get banned for your own fault of not trying to fix the problem.
However I can imagine people snipe to make a scam report if someone's off on a vacation.
So what I think should be added which not only helps the suspect but the reporter himself too. We should allow that the person to have as much time to respond to the scam report (first message that is) as old the "scam is".
For example lets say Bob scams Steve. And Steve decides to open a scam report 3 days later. Bob should have 3 days to respond because Steve has delayed to make the scam report.
Why would we want the scam report not to be delayed? Because then it gives more accurate information and can solve everything much easier and gives the suspect a little more time to answer, rather than being banned for not saying a single word. This also makes the scammed user have a less reason to drag on the whole shit. We want it to be done asap, right?
Some bad things are :
-If you send in a scam report really late, the scammer has more time to scam others and will simply not reply
-It stresses out the scammed user even more after being scammed to have to urgently send in a scam report
Just a suggestion. Not sure if it's worth it, but some time or thinking could be put into this because I feel like having to wait 24 hours is pretty short because anyone could be busy right then. But then again we expect you to be active.
Otherwise I believe that those who haven't had a time to reply to their scam report should be given a specific date to arrange it. If that scammer really thinks he's innocent.
However I can imagine people snipe to make a scam report if someone's off on a vacation.
So what I think should be added which not only helps the suspect but the reporter himself too. We should allow that the person to have as much time to respond to the scam report (first message that is) as old the "scam is".
For example lets say Bob scams Steve. And Steve decides to open a scam report 3 days later. Bob should have 3 days to respond because Steve has delayed to make the scam report.
Why would we want the scam report not to be delayed? Because then it gives more accurate information and can solve everything much easier and gives the suspect a little more time to answer, rather than being banned for not saying a single word. This also makes the scammed user have a less reason to drag on the whole shit. We want it to be done asap, right?
Some bad things are :
-If you send in a scam report really late, the scammer has more time to scam others and will simply not reply
-It stresses out the scammed user even more after being scammed to have to urgently send in a scam report
Just a suggestion. Not sure if it's worth it, but some time or thinking could be put into this because I feel like having to wait 24 hours is pretty short because anyone could be busy right then. But then again we expect you to be active.
Otherwise I believe that those who haven't had a time to reply to their scam report should be given a specific date to arrange it. If that scammer really thinks he's innocent.
- Type
- Suggestion
- Status
- Denied
