It would simply prevent them from being scammed. Just play with the name to make it easier. Example: recommended sellerThis would simply confuse new members.
True but the rank would be selectively chosen to faithful members that are well knownNot sure this would really be needed. People can look just below the rank, to see how much reputation a user has. A rank saying someone is trustable, would just be repeating the infomation just below it, and could potentially mislead people.
If you asked me to compile a list of which members you can trust, the list would be empty, and nobody would have the rank. Which is exactly as it should be. You can never trust anyone but yourself, and some people can't even do that.True but the rank would be selectively chosen to faithful members that are well known
Denied, thanks for the suggestion.If you asked me to compile a list of which members you can trust, the list would be empty, and nobody would have the rank. Which is exactly as it should be. You can never trust anyone but yourself, and some people can't even do that.
If you believe otherwise, you're being naive, and if MC-Market were to label people as trustworthy, then MC-market would be misleading people with false information and granting titles that we have no business granting.
Use your brain to tell you who is more worthy of your trust than others. We have all the information out there for you. Look at their reputation, look at their posts, look at their reactions, look at their registration date, purchased ranks; and make the best call for you.
Trying to rely on MC-Market to determine who is or isn't trustworthy is just transferring responsibility that should be yours, and I'm not looking to get yelled at by members who blindly went with a "trusted" tag we gave someone rather than looking at all of the information themselves and making their own determination.
