Making scam reports more civilized

[Choo]

Okay, first off I'm not even sure if rule 1.6 is even taken into action in the Scam Reports section, it's not too common to see people flame their accusers with famous one-liners such as:
''

''
and
''

''
Taken from only one thread. (IMGs)
One other thing, mods don't seem to be even flinching at these crude comments. They are not getting censored at all and those comments just make scam reports way less civilized and can turn those threads into toxic flame wars. These comments are clearly a direct violation of rule 1.6.

What I'm suggesting is to either make the Scam Resolvers either warn the users for negative behavior (either warn verbally then proceed to add warning points), or at least censor their comments in order for the SR to be way more civilized with more professional conversations. This idea might actually make dealing with scam reports a little bit easier and can make the accuser and defendant stay on-topic.

Maybe the rule is already in effect in the Scam Reports section, but nothing is being done about it and it's probably the section of which that rule should be enforced the most.
Now please, if you disagree, please explain why. And thanks

 

[JayMC]

Completely agree, facts over insults!

 

[E_Hos]

It's like a bunch of liberals bashing the color of someone's hat in there.

Clean it up!

 

[Clouse]

Man, you guys really feel this way? Personally, I just look at scam reports when I want to watch a drama flick it's honestly better than most of the shows on the tv right now. Well, I guess if we want to be professional we can censor them but like let's be honest. Do it for the views!

 

[jxhdvn]

Personally, I just look at scam reports when I want to watch a drama flick it's honestly better than most of the shows on the tv right now.

lmao this is true

 

[android.]

I sometimes read scam reports instead of novels lol

 

[Flipora]

It's like a bunch of liberals bashing the color of someone's hat in there.

Clean it up!

Your comment was literally useless and was just used to take a shot at liberals except you just made something up to do that...

If anything this is exactly what they were doing in the scam report meaning you’re exactly the kind of person you appear to hate

 

[Choo]

Your comment was literally useless and was just used to take a shot at liberals except you just made something up to do that...

Many thanks for reviving the thread, this is one of the more important suggestions.

 

[Flipora]

Many thanks for reviving the thread, this is one of the more important suggestions.

I totally agree. It was unintentional but they already edit the comments so it seems easy to just edit the bad phrases like that also

 

[Choo]

I wanna hear more thoughts

 

[Satan]

If a user is being toxic/uncivil and doesn't provide anything constructive toward the scam report, it should prompt the resolver to demand a valid reply to the report instead of just toxic slander.

We shouldn't make toxicity/uncivil behavior in scam reports mandatory/censored out of the posts. Thats just my opinion.

 

[Choo]

Unless this rule has been enforced more seriously in the past year, I really don’t think it should matter. If anything you should be looking at the bigger picture, and your suggestion should be that it should be enforced more. I’ve seen people shitting on each other in the shoutbox basically doing the same thing as the scam reports. The rule really isn’t enforced, and honestly it would be a pain in the ass to because 90% of people on here are toxic asf. It’s a minecraft forum anyways, it shouldn’t be business professional.

https://gyazo.com/b71f4d7d1584400e1e7d85bc534b43b6
OwO what's this?
They are listening![DOUBLEPOST=1552580637][/DOUBLEPOST]

We shouldn't make toxicity/uncivil behavior in scam reports mandatory/censored out of the posts. Thats just my opinion.

What do you think happens with posts that violate rule 1.6 anywhere on the forum?

 

[Mick]

Since the time that this suggestion was made we have an entirely new staff team. I've brought this up with our current scam resolver team and they've confirmed that although we no longer accept these sorts of comments, especially ones that break our rules to the extent from your examples.

Denied, thanks for the suggestion.