Multiple scam reports = top priority

[Arshi]

Users with multiple scam reports should be prioiritized because there would Literally be ONE reason and they are exit scamming. Perfect example Savree

Spoiler: Scam reports for user #1

https://www.mc-market.org/threads/500170

https://www.mc-market.org/threads/500144

https://www.mc-market.org/threads/499839

https://www.mc-market.org/threads/499239/

Another user with multiple scam reports
xDesi

Spoiler: Scam reports for user 2

https://www.mc-market.org/threads/496875

https://www.mc-market.org/threads/496402/

My suggestion would be to have a filter on threads made on the titles which would be for their username (first word in title) and would alrt scam resolvers.

These types of threads should be handled differently as in discussing the matter from one resolver to another if they come to a conclusion that the user is suspicious, they ban the user with no time given for response. Espicially with user #1 listed above. Thanks for reading and taking ur time. Ty

 

[Eric]

There should NEVER be a priority order on Scam reports, other than date. The only way is to hire more scam report staff, which is what they're trying to do.

 

[Eric]

Normal scam reports - only one and resolve fairly quick
exit scammers - 5-10+ scam reports and they end up admitting by the time they get accepted
????

Hence why we need more scam resolvers. You can't order by priority in this case, a scam is a scam, money lost is money lost regardless of the amount.

 

[Arshi]

Hence why we need more scam resolvers. You can't order by priority in this case, a scam is a scam, money lost is money lost regardless of the amount.

There has been so many suggestions on hiring scam resolvers and its harder than you think. Only a few can fit the criteria and theres been soo many complaints of slow scam resolving but if you look at the replies by resolvers, they reply with the most simple replies/questions longer than usual. They ask for response from scammer of 48 hours, more than 72 hours will pass by without a response or half the time the reporter will respond before they do. If a user already scams a few people within a timeframe, they should be banned ASAP

 

[Fawks]

Only a few can fit the criteria

just so happens only one really meets the criteria; the other is biased as fuck.

 

[Eric]

There has been so many suggestions on hiring scam resolvers and its harder than you think. Only a few can fit the criteria and theres been soo many complaints of slow scam resolving but if you look at the replies by resolvers, they reply with the most simple replies/questions longer than usual. They ask for response from scammer of 48 hours, more than 72 hours will pass by without a response or half the time the reporter will respond before they do. If a user already scams a few people within a timeframe, they should be banned ASAP

Innocent until proven guilty my friend

 

[Kram]

Like others have said, certain reports should not be given priority. However, we do utilize the Restricted Account SR role when there are many scam reports on 1 user. For example, in your first spoiler, the user with 4 scam reports on him has been restricted. This role is given for either 2 reasons 1) It is an account that has the purpose of creating or continuing a scam report 2) To restrict users that there is some reason to believe has scamming intent or there is enough evidence to give that role temporarily. While it is subjective when to give this role, I believe this is better than prioritizing the report. If a person has 4-5 scam reports on them at one time each from different users that have no apparent connections, it is safe to say that restricting the user would be a good action to show people they shouldn't deal with them for the time being as well as restricting them from trying to do deals on the site while the scam report is in progress.

 

[Mick]

Like others have said, certain reports should not be given priority. However, we do utilize the Restricted Account SR role when there are many scam reports on 1 user. For example, in your first spoiler, the user with 4 scam reports on him has been restricted. This role is given for either 2 reasons 1) It is an account that has the purpose of creating or continuing a scam report 2) To restrict users that there is some reason to believe has scamming intent or there is enough evidence to give that role temporarily. While it is subjective when to give this role, I believe this is better than prioritizing the report. If a person has 4-5 scam reports on them at one time each from different users that have no apparent connections, it is safe to say that restricting the user would be a good action to show people they shouldn't deal with them for the time being as well as restricting them from trying to do deals on the site while the scam report is in progress.

Denied, thanks for the suggestion.