I don't see why I have to explain me disagreeing with a post? Minene, and other people have already explained why I disagree with the suggestion. (thats why I agreed with their posts, instead of making one and saying the same exact thing).Habin_Is_Cool Mat & Mrminer012 you have provided no real reason to disagree?
especially you Habin_Is_Cool considering you asked for this.[DOUBLEPOST=1481316190][/DOUBLEPOST]Tehker & ry9, reason for disagreeing? My situation aside.
I made my suggestion right when the 30-day cool-down was initiated because, like you, I was salty I was stuck with the name I had for 30 days and wanted it changed. A shorter cool-down period might not be so bad, but completely removing the cool-down would allow room for chaos with people changing their names constantly.Habin_Is_Cool Mat & Mrminer012 you have provided no real reason to disagree?
especially you Habin_Is_Cool considering you asked for this.[DOUBLEPOST=1481316190][/DOUBLEPOST]Tehker & ry9, reason for disagreeing? My situation aside.
This, yes.I would be OK with each person getting one "exception" name-change, where the moderators will name-change them back to their old name and explain that it's the only time they'll do that and otherwise they'll have to wait a month each time. That seems fair and reasonable to me. This would be a solution that works for everyone, I think.
