New reputation rule

[Jay C]

So recently, a guy named Da ni el revenge repped me, and i reported it. He did it 2times last week, and both got removed. But today he once again is salty and decided to neg me again.
This is an extremely annoying thing, then i thought to myself " is this not bannable?" so i decided to check the rules on the wiki , and NO, its not bannable.
Therefore

MAKE REPEATED NEG REPPING AGAINST A RULE
MAKE A RULE THAT DOES NOT ALLOW REPEATED NEG REPPING

 

[Justis]

If it got removed, that means it did violate a rule.

With the introduction of reputation edit and deletion history for moderators, this will become much easier to enforce. (Currently there are no logs whatsoever to go off of) Especially with a dispute becoming staff policy for all false rep reports. If they add it again without modification it will violate the same rule they would have been told it violated, and they can be warned for it.

We're just waiting for the rep addon modifications to be made.

 

[Ever]

I fully agree, you have to spend time reporting the neg rep over and over and it gets annoying!

 

[Jay C]

With the introduction of reputation edit and deletion history for moderators, this will become much easier to enforce. (Currently there are no logs whatsoever to go off of) Especially with a dispute becoming staff policy for all false rep reports. If they add it again without modification it will violate the same rule they would have been told it violated, and they can be warned for it.

We're just waiting for the rep addon modifications to be made.

i admire u for actually replying. thanks my dude

 

[Ever]

If it got removed, that means it did violate a rule.

With the introduction of reputation edit and deletion history for moderators, this will become much easier to enforce. (Currently there are no logs whatsoever to go off of) Especially with a dispute becoming staff policy for all false rep reports. If they add it again without modification it will violate the same rule they would have been told it violated, and they can be warned for it.

We're just waiting for the rep addon modifications to be made.

ill be dead by the time its made

 

[Jay C]

That's not the community runs,

If someone neg rep you that means they have their own point of how they see you in the their eyes.
Of-course revenge is a thing in this market but don't make it bannable either give them "Warning points"

If someone repeated neg rep you it doesn't matter whatsoever its pretty much "HOW THEY SAW YOU"
What about, If someone gives you a +rep but due to this rule, You can't rep him back.

Either way, I would suggest to get so called "Reputation resolver" because without that thing implemented into the system we are going to get no where with reputations.

nope Da ni el just neg repped me for thr 3rd time, and this time was for "not working well with others, toxic". i have never worked with him before and he is just doing this cos he probs doesnt meet the age requirements for the site

 

[Ivain]

The reason you 'rarely' see staff team 'doing their work' is because 90% of staff's activity is behind the scenes.
I agree scam reports right now are ridiculously bloody slow, but normal reports are usually handled within a few days.
Having been staff myself I can easily remember how fast those reports stack up. If no staff-member processes them fast enough, it can reach a stack of 500 or so unprocessed reports in a few days.
Now, my reports are usually processed in 3 days or less, so I'd hardly call them inactive.

 

[Grace.]

Totally agree, if they false neg rep you and staff agree, then I think the 2nd time they do it it should be a warning, then if it happens again after that then they should get a 2 week suspension. ( my opinion on this )

 

[Harry]

Jay C Dude, you're such a fucking hypocrite. It's beyond me how you've been acting the last few weeks and I wasn't going to say anything when I originally saw this post but now...

So, you create an appraisal thread with no information, literally nothing that someone could give an accurate appraisal with but yet, you just get angry when someone asks questions on the thread. Thread: https://www.mc-market.org/threads/324793/

After another user and I ask a few questions to try to get an accurate appraisal, you falsely negative rep another user. All they asked is if it had a web panel (since Dyno has one and you said it was better than Dyno). Yet, as I pointed out in the thread, you clearly can't use simple English. https://ibb.co/fUTM6c

I then negative rep you and, you negative rep back me with something about trashing your thread, which was again, false. I never trashed it, another user and I were asking questions, to give you an accurate appraisal. You then got angry.

So, I originally reported the negative rep against me but and it was only just removed today but you added it back 12 minutes later...

If it got removed, that means it did violate a rule.

^
Please listen Jay C

 

[Jay C]

Jay C Dude, you're such a fucking hypocrite. It's beyond me how you've been acting the last few weeks and I wasn't going to say anything when I originally saw this post but now...

So, you create an appraisal thread with no information, literally nothing that someone could give an accurate appraisal with but yet, you just get angry when someone asks questions on the thread. Thread: https://www.mc-market.org/threads/324793/

After another user and I ask a few questions to try to get an accurate appraisal, you falsely negative rep another user. All they asked is if it had a web panel (since Dyno has one and you said it was better than Dyno). Yet, as I pointed out in the thread, you clearly can't use simple English. https://ibb.co/fUTM6c

I then negative rep you and, you negative rep back me with something about trashing your thread, which was again, false. I never trashed it, another user and I were asking questions, to give you an accurate appraisal. You then got angry.

So, I originally reported the negative rep against me but and it was only just removed today but you added it back 12 minutes later...

​

^
Please listen Jay C

lol ur funny, u thrashed my thread and disagreed with literally every single post for no reason, therefore i fairly gave u a neutral rep for thrashing. because of that, ur little mind decided to turn my neutral rep u gave on me previously into a neg for the same reason. Don’t call me a hypocrite when ur pathetic

 

[Harry]

lol ur funny, u thrashed my thread and disagreed with literally every single post for no reason, therefore i fairly gave u a neutral rep for a thrashing. because of that, ur little mind decided to turn my neutral rep u gave on me previously into a neg for the same reason. Don’t call me a hypocrite when ur pathetic

You literally had no information on the thread so how could anyone give an accurate appraisal? We asked questions and you just got angry and acting like you owned the website/thread... How is that trashing when you're the one getting angry?

"Fine. Do note DO NOT REPLY WITH QUESTIONS anymore please, i want numbers."
"it’s an application. don’t reply with questions just reply with a number"

You can't tell us not to ask questions, etc.

Anyway, I'm not going to argue here. The reputation got removed the first time so people stop adding it back.