New Sort Of Rep System

[The Chainsmokers]

Hello, Let me get to the point, rep, is very effective on MCM, if you got bad rep, you will never get money, if you have good rep, you rolling in sales, What is priming is a system that will allow no person to abuse/gang the reputation system, before making a sale, there is an option for the user you are dealing with profile that will send them a notification that someone is gonna do an exchange, if that user accepts, it adds neutral points to both users, Then, if the sale goes well, they can set it to Positive and if it goes bad, negative, this will stop people from gang repping on people they don't like, DISCLAIMER, No I'm not saying to remove current rep system, I'm saying to add another one.

 

[Fire]

If you or someone else gets gang rep'ed. You can report it, and a staff member will remove it. Since gang reping is against the rules.

 

[The Chainsmokers]

If you or someone else gets gang rep'ed. You can report it, and a staff member will remove it. Since gang reping is against the rules.

Lol, i wish they accepted me when that happened to me

 

[Samuel]

Lol, i wish they accepted me when that happened to me

Both of your -reps are personal. That's not gang rep.

 

[Fire]

Lol, i wish they accepted me when that happened to me

Looking at the two - rep's on your profile. They both look diffrent deals (months apart) that could be why they didnt remove it when reported.

Though if you open a support request, you could technically get both of those rep's removed. Since they dont abide by the rules:

"9.2 Do not accuse members of scamming without linking a scam report on that member which you have started."

Both those rep's call you a scammer without a link to a scam report.

 

[Justis]

So you want to keep the current reputation system as your community reputation; and in addition, have a trade reputation for sales only, and you believe your suggested system for trade reputation would be able to keep track of this?
The reason trade reputation was removed before, was because it was being abused, and staff members were unable to verify if deals had actually occurred.

Your system does ensure that both people have agreed to get/give rep from each other under the guise of a deal; it's a good idea. However, there's still the problem of users faking deals. Negative gang repping wouldn't be possible but positive gang repping would be. It creates a very bias atmosphere in which users are able to artificially grow their reputation and avoid being damaged in any way.
I imagine this 'trade' reputation system is less your reputation, and more "How many deals do you and other people say you've done".

 

[Cal]

Why add unnecessary complications to a system that already works well. Also periods exist, just figured I should let you know.

 

[The Chainsmokers]

Both of your -reps are personal. That's not gang rep.

I got them to remove it, and the top one was removed and then added back
the other guy I never worked with but apparently I don't have proof of not working with someone i don't work with[DOUBLEPOST=1493944774][/DOUBLEPOST]

Why add unnecessary complications to a system that already works well. Also periods exist, just figured I should let you know.

Respectful Child, thank you.

 

[Fire]

The rep system is never going to be right. No matter what you do.

Who is more reputable? Someone who buys 2 OG accounts for $400 each. Or someone who buys 20 semi's for a total of $80. The rep system would make it look like the person who purchaced the semi's was more trustable. The current system and your idea would still have this same problem. No matter what the reputation system is changed to, it will always fall short one way or another. I tried, and even i couldnt figure out a way for it to work perfectly.

Its not that bad rn, therefore i see little point changing it.

 

[Ivain]

Gang-repping is forbidden in the first place, or at least it was last time I checked the rules. That it happens is either because people are stupid enough to think they'll get away with it, or because they HAVE gotten away with it.

 

[Mick]

Further complicating the reputation system is not something that we need right now. If you'd like to report a reputation for being false and can provide proof, it will be removed.

Denied, thanks for the suggestion.