Looking for a Non-Exclusive Factions Spawn for cheap. PM me with details!
I might have one, add me on skype: AekalixThread clearly says Factions.
My bad, I must have missed that my bad, sending you some pictures.Thread clearly says Factions.
This statement is completely innacturate, user was pushing me to make it fast. And I decided to back out of the deal, as I don't like rushing.Don't deal with this guy. I paid him for a product and he deleted me, and never delivered it. Be careful.
You have 5 negative rep, enough said.This statement is completely innacturate, user was pushing me to make it fast. And I decided to back out of the deal, as I don't like rushing.
I have better rep then you.You have 5 negative rep, enough said.
Nope, you have a total of 5 negative reputation. I have a total of 1, and it's from you, the scamming youngster.I have better rep then you.
I have better rep then you.
Personally I would consider a 7-1 person (rep) to be a more reputable and trustworthy person as opposed to someone with 12-5. Partially because 5 people with a similar opinion are 5 separate people, and the likelihood of them having the same bias is unlikely, making them somewhat more... informative. Another reason, it comes down to a similar concept; one person who de-repped someone else, out of 7 other people is more than likely going to be less.. informative/trustworthy/whatever, especially if the de-repper has been de-repped so many times. Also, another thing to note - if said dereps are "valuable" (trustworthy in a way), it should be considered even more critically and held in more worth than a positive.Nope, you have a total of 5 negative reputation. I have a total of 1, and it's from you, the scamming youngster.
Thank you. Honestly most of them are false reputations.Personally I would consider a 7-1 person (rep) to be a more reputable and trustworthy person as opposed to someone with 12-5. Partially because 5 people with a similar opinion are 5 separate people, and the likelihood of them having the same bias is unlikely, making them somewhat more... informative. Another reason, it comes down to a similar concept; one person who de-repped someone else, out of 7 other people is more than likely going to be less.. informative/trustworthy/whatever, especially if the de-repper has been de-repped so many times. Also, another thing to note - if said dereps are "valuable" (trustworthy in a way), it should be considered even more critically and held in more worth than a positive.
^ not to trash the thread, just voicing my opinion. Good luck.
