Lately I've seen a lot of people use Nulled software for example (WHMCS) I think people who can not show proof that is a valid software if asked should get there thread removed/issued warning points.
- Type
- Suggestion
- Status
- Denied
Lately I've seen a lot of people use Nulled software for example (WHMCS) I think people who can not show proof that is a valid software if asked should get there thread removed/issued warning points.
Just because WHMCS is a billing system and XenForo a forum doesn't make it any better to use the nulled software...-Snippet-
I'm not too concerned with nulled XenForo's they are a risk all the same but if it gets backdoored, then a server has its forum trashed, few emails gathered. Its not a catastrophic problem.
And you call yourself a system admin? k
WHMCS is more of a target for backdoors due to the nature of its purpose. If you do a quick google search for "Nulled WHMCS" most results are dodgy sites, which should be avoided.Just because WHMCS is a billing system and XenForo a forum doesn't make it any better to use the nulled software...
It's almost just as bad as WHMCS. It's still private information and it's not unlikely that the nulled software has a working password grabber. Since most people use the same password for everything, you'd be causing a lot of security issues for your site visitors.
And you call yourself a system admin? k
On topic: Yes, this already disallowed and back when I was admin on here punishments were given for it.
Fire was just stating what he believed, it isn't fair to bash him over that. I think you, above all people, know there are different levels of experience when it comes to being a system administrator.
--snip because it contains a lot of useless info--
It's okay if you've money, I purchase my software now, but there was a time when I couldn't, therefore I have more understanding for people who do use nulled software. I never said that I encourage or endorse the use of nulled software. If someone is using a nulled copy of WHMCS then people can easily check with their online checker. You can't with XenForo, if the rules change to warn/ban anyone with a server using a nulled copy of Xenforo, there would be problems. At an educated guess I would estimate that a little over half the people here who use Xenforo are using a nulled copy. There would be an influx of some true some false reports of people using a nulled copy. Then trying to get them to provide proof, and dealing with all the cases of saying they were unaware, since someone else set it up, or they bought it from someone else. Or they got a legit license from someone, but can't remember who etc. But it's not your forum now, so none of that would be your responsibility.System administrator experience doesn't have to do with any of this. We're discussing the use of nulled software.
You've just missed my entire point. You're trying to say that using nulled software is not a problem while it is. It doesn't matter what CMS or software it is. If it's hosted publicly, is storing user data and costs money, nulling is not ok. People develop this sort of stuff full time. You're literally stealing money from them.
If you can't afford it, too bad. Plenty of alternatives which work.
Fire's logic is nowhere to be found. "Nulled XenForo is fine. GOD FORBID YOU USE NULLED WHMCS. 60 WARNING POINT PLZ!!". They are both nulled software and completely illegal. If any kind of nulled software is allowed, we might as well become the 2nd HackForums, even then, they don't allow nulled software either lol.
You're missing my point once again... What makes it okay to null XenForo but not WHMCS? It's a legitimate question because you're claiming that members shouldn't be punished for using a nulled XF but they should be punished for using a nulled WHMCS.It's okay if you've money, I purchase my software now, but there was a time when I couldn't, therefore I have more understanding for people who do use nulled software. I never said that I encourage or endorse the use of nulled software. If someone is using a nulled copy of WHMCS then people can easily check with their online checker. You can't with XenForo, if the rules change to warn/ban anyone with a server using a nulled copy of Xenforo, there would be problems. At an educated guess I would estimate that a little over half the people here who use Xenforo are using a nulled copy. There would be an influx of some true some false reports of people using a nulled copy. Then trying to get them to provide proof, and dealing with all the cases of saying they were unaware, since someone else set it up, or they bought it from someone else. Or they got a legit license from someone, but can't remember who etc. But it's not your forum now, so none of that would be your responsibility.
As I have discusses in length, the risk of using a nulled Xenforo can be reduced to an almost negligible level. As a user, you should be using a different password for their email as well. This applies for in all cases. You can protect yourself quite easily, which you should be doing so anyway. With WHMCS you are directly entering your credit card details and address as well as other information. There is nothing the user can really do. Therefore I would say WHMCS is a higher risk.
The point of stealing money from a company by using a nulled piece of software depends on the way you look at it. Sometimes it can even help companies. But ill let you look into that yourself, rather than going through it.
There is little point me typing much more, all you've done so far, is use a few cheap insults on me, and make me look as bad as possible when expressing my opinion, I said nothing to try and offend you, I even went as far as complementing you saying you're more experienced than I and tried to understand your opinion best I could. I don't really want to lower myself and retaliate, since this is the suggestions forum, and cluttering the thread with a flame war, wouldn't benefit anyone. If there are any more sarcastic comments you have ready, PM me and we can discuss it further. But here's not the place.
You think nulled software is wrong, that's it. Which is fine, a lot of people think that way. It's called binary thinking. However, I don't get to see it like that. I've already stated, that if you're careful, security isn't too much of a problem, so I'll disregard that for now.You're missing my point once again... What makes it okay to null XenForo but not WHMCS? It's a legitimate question because you're claiming that members shouldn't be punished for using a nulled XF but they should be punished for using a nulled WHMCS.
Perma-ban anyone trying to profit from nulled software
