OGs [revised]

[Marth]

after hearing feedback on the previous thread, there's no way to really implement my suggestions; i may have come as unclear. here is a revised thread that may be a better compromise for both parties
★
1) when posting an account there should be an optional text box called "owner history". this would encourage users to provide history for the convenience of potential buyers without forcing anything upon them. since we know most these accounts are jacked lol, "og owner" is definitely viable and would suffice.
★
hopefully my intentions have become more clear... this change would benefit both sellers and buyers without changing the way the market works. trying to abolish secrets and hypocrisy
★
hoping to hear a constructive discussion

 

[Taiga]

I agree with the first suggestion, but disagree with the second.
While we all know that stolen/cracked/etc are sold here, that rule about it being prohibited makes a stand that MCM doesn't support stealing from other people to make a buck. Mick won't make any more money by allowing those kind of transactions to happend, sellers are already hiding it well-enough, and MCM saves some face by publicly not allowing stolen goods to be sold.

 

[Ivain]

Let's also be honest here, most of us don't WANT the sort of crowd attracted to cracked accounts. You think the forum is full of immature people and toxic kids now? It's never been more peaceful. It was REALLY bad back when accounts could be sold freely. The description "a toxic cesspit" was not very far off back then.
I, for one, do not want those type of people back.

 

[Zeiyon]

Let's also be honest here, most of us don't WANT the sort of crowd attracted to cracked accounts. You think the forum is full of immature people and toxic kids now? It's never been more peaceful. It was REALLY bad back when accounts could be sold freely. The description "a toxic cesspit" was not very far off back then.
I, for one, do not want those type of people back.

May I ask why you didnt ’Disagree’ then ?

 

[Ivain]

May I ask why you didnt ’Disagree’ then ?

because my mouse broke this morning so left click is broke. I had to get a spare mouse first.

 

[Marth]

Let's also be honest here, most of us don't WANT the sort of crowd attracted to cracked accounts. You think the forum is full of immature people and toxic kids now? It's never been more peaceful. It was REALLY bad back when accounts could be sold freely. The description "a toxic cesspit" was not very far off back then.
I, for one, do not want those type of people back.

What's your opinion on the owner history box?

 

[Dragonfly]

Strongly agree with #1, strongly disagree with #2.

 

[Ivain]

What's your opinion on the owner history box?

That seems like a good idea. Scrap the second and I'll change the disagree to an agree.

 

[Marth]

That seems like a good idea. Scrap the second and I'll change the disagree to an agree.

I agree with the first suggestion, but disagree with the second.
While we all know that stolen/cracked/etc are sold here, that rule about it being prohibited makes a stand that MCM doesn't support stealing from other people to make a buck. Mick won't make any more money by allowing those kind of transactions to happend, sellers are already hiding it well-enough, and MCM saves some face by publicly not allowing stolen goods to be sold.

this suggestion is now just about the owner history box

 

[Hawkk]

The problem with the first suggestion is that most of the time the seller doesn't know the owner history..

 

[Mick]

I'll move this to pending for now.

Thanks for the suggestion.