Only 5 Unique Hytale TopLists
- Thread starter DannyMe
- Start date
-
- Tags
- hytale hytale toplist
- Status
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.
Second point was mostly pointed at "Why would you limit a site's width/height with pixels or why even use pixels in 2019 within css"
All sites are mobile-friendly. So still don't get what you mean by 'limits'
Have you ever used any of front-end frameworks? Or maybe heard of framework like bootstrap? You know the framework which is the most known and used framework and is developed by team of developers. They have plenty of pixels. Are they wrong? I am abit confused about what you are trying to point out? What enchanced technique and framework you use which puts the rest of frameworks or developers to sleep? If I am late with technologies have to know.
1. if you are selling something for a price like that I expect it to be up to date
why would you use pixels and tripple your code's size to support all devices instead of vw/vh
2. bootstrap and other frameworks date way back updating it all is difficult and they dont need to update since everyone is used to the old way of how it works, which is why its still a bad framework
You just stated that vw/vh shrinks the size of css. And opposit - tripples? Where these calculations came from?
Other strong statement is - frameworks are out dated. Have you see the last bootstrap release?
Or you are that kind of guy who has 1 client and has loads of time to invent new frameworks instead of doing things more time efficient way?
I would agree to disagree that using anything else then vw/vh is wrong.
You have your own way of doing things, but when you work as programmer and you get paid for time - no one will pay you for time you spent to invent what's already invented. At this case front-end framework.
I am talking about you having to write multiple versions of same css for different sizes so that it stays responsive instead of writing only 2 versions
As for the 1 customer statement
through January I had 16 requests 14 of those were complete
I don't use frameworks at all, why waste the time and effort into learning a framework that will make the code larger and messier
I am talking about you having to write multiple versions of same css for different sizes so that it stays responsive instead of writing only 2 versions
As for the 1 customer statement
through January I had 16 requests 14 of those were complete
I don't use frameworks at all, why waste the time and effort into learning a framework that will make the code larger and messier
Since when you have to write multiple css for multiple sizes? I use media queries for specific elements. Most likely main content holder.
Edit: what these css versions are? Can you use programmers terminology so I could answer to you.
The rest are by percents.
So is it still wrong? I just can't get your point.
Btw found post where guy shares his achievements when he stopped using frameworks. It's for back-end but fits front as well.
https://dev.to/gypsydave5/why-you-shouldnt-use-a-web-framework-3g24
Read comments.
"I completely agree. I ditched frameworks 5 years ago and started writing everything from scratch. My OS isn't as secure as it could be and the TCP stack isn't fast but the HTTP parser took fewer months than I'd expected.
5 years later, I'm nearly finished with the login page and my client is furious. Hire me?"
So you are saying that in January you coded 14 functioning websites? And all coding w/o frameworks? I should out-source you. Unless all of these jobs were little fixes I just can't believe.
Last edited:
I am talking about media yes, you had to adjust it for multiple sizes rather than just once for phones
14 clients doesn't mean full websites
some were full websites, some were 1 pages, some where the small info pages and so on
I've been working as a web designer and developer for over 3 years and I've never done a site for a client with a framework
This was mostly a way of giving you a tip and to tell you that in my eyes this isnt worth that much without a cleaner and better code
The part for frameworks is as follows:
You get everything preset yes, but unless you want to leave it the same as it comes out of the box its not worth rewriting so much of css to get to a point where it doesnt look like a default design that comes with the said framework
I am in this thing for 11 years. So ehen it comes to time efficiency. And you just dont have to reinvent bycycle you use framework. Then you minmize it. Take the bits you dont need and done.
One good quote for you to think about:
What's worse:
- Reinventing the wheel slowly and missing deadlines
- Or endlessly changing the wheels of your car with different shinier, slightly flawed wheels trapped in programming purgatory forever?
Why would you miss a deadline though
if you are missing a deadline that means you either miscalculated your capabilities or that you didn't work when you should
That's not my words. That's quote. I see you have your opinion which is cool. But instead of sharing it here. Create thread on this forum. Express your thoughts on statements you made. Let community to discuss. Post link here. I will be happy to be part of discussion. How does that sound?
Last edited:
I wasn't planning on having this conversation, goal was to ask why not switch to vw/vh and make your life easier rather than using pixels and have to adjust it so often with media
Good luck selling this resource and have a nice day
(Don't think I was badmouthing you saying this is a bad resource or anything like that)
My life is easy. Clients happy. Sites fast (checked my various speed testers). Like that guy posted, which I quoted. I don't invent wheel instead I spend time picking the one I want.I wasn't planning on having this conversation, goal was to ask why not switch to vw/vh and make your life easier rather than using pixels and have to adjust it so often with media
Good luck selling this resource and have a nice day
(Don't think I was badmouthing you saying this is a bad resource or anything like that)
I am not selling domains for 500. Godaddy does. 100usd for toplist? Tell me which good programmer would waste time for such an pennies and I will out source him. Sound too good to be true and seems you're just braging nonsense. But PM if you know anyone who will code sexier toplist for 100. I will have alot of jobs for him/her.
Make a better one. Then your post will have value. Atm you are just trashing here.
Pay & proove then we will have a discussion. You are not developer nor paid anyone 100usd for toplist all you do here is being cocky and acting smart. Don't want to be rude. So for now I want to see here links to all the projects you own. So I could see that you are experienced and not trash talking. Get me a web developer which will create better quality work for 100usd. I mean 'unique'. You wont need to pay. But shoutout one here.
Thank you
Dan
Last edited:
- Status
