Well, I didn't call it a template, just unorganised, however:
HTML isn't classed as coding, more like writing or describing, actually.
Bootstrap isn't bad to use, it's neat. I use it myself. Lays out the core foundation to build from, for the same reason you stated: [it] saves tons of time.
Assuming it isn't a template, some things seem splashed on. If I wanted to provide something unconstructive, I would have, but I'd gladly elaborate on specifics.
https://mctrailers.thrus-dev.com/
"Order Now" needs a slight colour change to show it's being hovered over. It seems too static and confusing.
The cover image needs to be extended. Seeing "Our Work" here just seems off.
I don't think that's appropriate for the homepage. The homepage should just show a general portfolio.
"7 pending orders" seems out of place.
Footer extends too long.
I could comment on the things he did right, but he knows what he did right. He asked for criticism, not to tell him what he did right (designers already know that). It's our jobs to be harsh, that's what creates change. I could just suck his ass to the point where I'm flattering a design, but that's not going to change anything (besides, I don't do that).
You need to learn to take some criticism, honestly. The OP took it fine. He asked for opinions, not flattery.
I love how you do exactly what I tell people not to: argue with me over principle. You fit into a category of people that wish to continue arguing rather than proceed and do something constructive. Arguments are great, could've been a politician, but you don't progress, so that makes you a kid. Not a big difference between a politician and a kid, is there? Let's progress on the feedback, yeah?
Try not to take it personally. Yeah I'm a kid, and this is a forum full of them. I don't want to argue, just pointing out some rather funny mistakes you've made which has ended up in contradicting yourself.
