The only affiliation between Paladin and the leaking website is the owner’s. That don’t affect Paladin services.The users mentioned were banned in connection with the leaking of Tommy W's product, among other users' products.
We've passed the threshold of evidence, including an admission from one of the owners, where there's no doubt in my mind. I can safely say that these users' bans will not be overturned.
I'm only writing this as I think it's key that we defend our resource and content creators on our platform, especially when their products get leaked through no fault of their own, but instead, what seem to be nefarious business practices from a third party.
This statement is false due to be got suspended for cheat development and has no proof to back this claim up.No joke.
So what, is it something server owners can put on their server and then essentislly have access to a user's files? Doesn't the victim have to actually consent to this bullshit prior, legally speaking?
