The title pretty much explains my suggestion. However, remove banned members from the top chatter section for the shoutbox since they are banned, and give other members a chance to make it onto the list etc. 
- Type
- Suggestion
- Status
- Denied
No, as they typically find there way back to the site. Only members who are truly banned from the site, with no return in the foreseen future.Would this count for suspended members too? I don't think you meant it like that but just wondering.
Or just get rid of it as it has no use.The title pretty much explains my suggestion. However, remove banned members from the top chatter section for the shoutbox since they are banned, and give other members a chance to make it onto the list etc.![]()
Presumably, we would have to find a way for the user to have their name re appear within the top chatters. Rather than removing the user, more so make them invisible. They will still be there, and if an unban were to happen they will just plop back into the spot they would fall under at the time. However, most members that are banned, do not end up unbanned. 9 time out of 10.[DOUBLEPOST=1545581758][/DOUBLEPOST]So what would happen if the members were unbanned?
It has a use for staff, as it's something mick needs to track. However, it's a good feature for users that like to know how much of a life they no longer have due to the shout box.Or just get rid of it as it has no use.
What is Mick able to do with a list of people that have no life?Presumably, we would have to find a way for the user to have their name re appear within the top chatters. Rather than removing the user, more so make them invisible. They will still be there, and if an unban were to happen they will just plop back into the spot they would fall under at the time. However, most members that are banned, do not end up unbanned. 9 time out of 10.[DOUBLEPOST=1545581758][/DOUBLEPOST]
It has a use for staff, as it's something mick needs to track. However, it's a good feature for users that like to know how much of a life they no longer have due to the shout box.
He needs it for staff, not for the members with no life. However, removing the whole system would cause complications with what mick needs it for. Hense why it is not being removed.What is Mick able to do with a list of people that have no life?
Why not remove it from public view, or just have it only count for staff members?He needs it for staff, not for the members with no life. However, removing the whole system would cause complications with what mick needs it for. Hense why it is not being removed.
Being that it only seems to be an issue to you, I do not see it being removed from public view as players like to know how much of a life they no longer have.[DOUBLEPOST=1545582078][/DOUBLEPOST]Why not remove it from public view, or just have it only count for staff members?
Mick wouldn't be the one to make the changemick will deny this in 2 months because he's too lazy to do it ^_^
Not really an issue, just something that has no use to most of the users here. I believe kag is the only one that actually checks the list constantlyBeing that it only seems to be an issue to you, I do not see it being removed from public view as players like to know how much of a life they no longer have.[DOUBLEPOST=1545582078][/DOUBLEPOST]
Mick wouldn't be the one to make the change![]()
Not surprised. However, I do tend to check it from time to time, when I no longer want to have a life. But, I get that. However, for the few "kag" that like to check it, would be the reason as to why it is still there.Not really an issue, just something that has no use to most of the users here. I believe kag is the only one that actually checks the list constantly![]()
