Reputation System Revamp

Status

Thiago

河童
Banned
Feedback score
0
Posts
148
Reactions
82
Resources
0
Hello,


I believe the Reputation System Rules, as it is now, is not good enough. There's a ton of people being able to provide False Reputation, as well as people who buy something for $1 and gets repped/rep.

I think that reputation rules be completely revamped, to prevent false reputation (reputation not containing useless information) (reputation that is not real). I mean, this is considered true reputation and has not yet been removed by staff.
https://gyazo.com/99fbf3fc5515504a7a422ca6b2b9dd72 (LOL)

Also, reputation reports aren't taken seriously. I've reported multiple times people repping other people for the simple reason "vouch" or "<3" and they're not deleted.

best regards,
Thiago.
 
Type
Suggestion
Status
Denied
Banned forever. Reason: Threatening to charge back against MC(Market and several users.)
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.

Neek

"Active" User
Supreme
Feedback score
21
Posts
558
Reactions
258
Resources
0
Has been suggested and denied. Look through before making a thread.
 

Thiago

河童
Banned
Feedback score
0
Posts
148
Reactions
82
Resources
0
Has been suggested and denied. Look through before making a thread.
I did, I am not blind. I've been suggested by a Staff to make this thread. Trash somewhere else please
 
Banned forever. Reason: Threatening to charge back against MC(Market and several users.)

Thiago

河童
Banned
Feedback score
0
Posts
148
Reactions
82
Resources
0
lol ive seen a thread like this at least twice every 2 weeks, it's become constant spam
It is good so Mick sees that the community supports this idea
 
Banned forever. Reason: Threatening to charge back against MC(Market and several users.)

Mick

BuiltByBit Owner
Management
Feedback score
28
Posts
6,411
Reactions
7,662
Resources
0
He cares? Same suggestion, 93 agrees, declined.
http://www.mc-market.org/threads/220525/
Community input is extremely important when making decisions, but at the end of the day, it's me that decides. The suggestion that you linked suggested to make the system "better" without providing any actual way to make it better which doesn't help at all. That suggestion could have had 1000 agrees and still wouldn't have been accepted as it was just a user complaining about the system without giving any input.

This suggestion here is the same too, saying that we need to "revamp" the rules without giving any more information about which rules or what to change them to.

Denied.
 
Status
Top