Reputation

[jacobi]

i just have a thot, what if mcm replicates paypals dispute payments, for example if Jimmy neg repped Penelope, Penelope can 'open a dispute' on that reputation, they have a 24hours to try and solve their issue between them, if they cant solve within 24 hours then staff get involved (dispute gets escalated) and then staff give the crown to whoever seems more reliable/correct, in which case the reputation that Jimmy put upon Penelope is locked their and cant be reported from Penelope again but CAN be deleted by Jimmy.

JUST AN IDEA DONT BE TO HARSH IM LITERALLY JUST TRYING MY BEST WHILE IM @ SCHOOL DONT HATE ME !

ALSO SORRY IF THIS HAS BEEN SUGGESTED >_<

 

[jacobi]

Point proven? What do you mean by that?

I DONT WANT TO SPEAK TO YOU BECAUSE U SOUND SMART.

 

[Mick]

We already have a replacement system planned for reputation moderation, in which disputes occur automatically between users, and staff join the active dispute after accepting responsibility for the report.
Users will then have chance to resolve or at least move along the dispute to the point where a staff member's final decision is hopefully all that's required.

The problem is our previous developer failed to provide us the features we paid for, so we'll be needing to get ourselves a new developer. He was recently demoted, as noted in the announcement.

As Justis has said, at the time that this thread was made we already had this idea in development and it has since been implemented as our dispute process. I think it's going pretty well!

I'll move this to denied since it was already a feature introduced, just not working when we first introduced it. Thanks for the suggestion.