I don't even know Linux nor do I talk to him, I'm just speaking from what I have seen.gee i wonder if linux is asking his friends on skype to post in this thread on his behalf
I don't even know Linux nor do I talk to him, I'm just speaking from what I have seen.gee i wonder if linux is asking his friends on skype to post in this thread on his behalf
let's ask SoldierAlex whose account was compromised with a link to linux's twitter placed in his signature and whose steam & skype and more were compromised by linux and his friends
Linux said this to the person who hacked SoliderAlex, looks like he tried to help..let's ask the people he scammed if he should be banned
Arc Corey B #YoloSolo Gravity (asked for a ban so he can't comment)
let's ask SoldierAlex whose account was compromised with a link to linux's twitter placed in his signature and whose steam & skype and more were compromised by linux and his friends
Linux did not compromise the account. Ew did, and put the linux thing as a joke, linux was not involved.
Linux said this to the person who hacked SoliderAlex, looks like he tried to help..
https://gyazo.com/659e567e449b654f519396e3fe5e62bf
No, it does not, but your point is now invalid as Linux did not do it nor was actually involved.oh ok that makes it alright then
I never said the unban was unintentional. I said it was a mistake.Now this is unvalid...
Mick has obviously stated in his thread that he was unbanned for fixing the "flaws in security". So how was he unintentionally unbanned? Persuade me.
Also, there should be evidence of him not scamming, correct? It seems a few users have gotten the chance to talk to him via Skype. I am speaking on no ones behalf and wondering how this works.
He is a friend of mine, yes, but what does it matter? As someone who knows him would I not know more than the average user about him? Which, is the case, so, my opinion is important to this debate.Again you're his best friend.
No, it does not, but your point is now invalid as Linux did not do it nor was actually involved.
Linux didnt scam me and I have logs proving that I requested an unban from him. It was a misunderstanding. But to be honest, I dont think he cares about MCM anymore like others lol...
I know I've made my mistakes.. but I guess LinuxKernel should really be unbanned for some certain reasons he didn't do, and yet, he was falsely banned for scamming, but as I have thought, I've made a thread about Mick's decision to Linux's ban, and that was wrong of me of doing that and creating the flame thread itself, but in the behalf of myself, I'd love to have Linux back to MCM
I said above why my opinion here matters, and he was telling the person who took access to stop, and as retaliation, Ew put linux in the bio to in a sorts... frame him? It is very hard to explain. I am not show favoritism whatsoever. I am just stating facts and my personal opinions that are not wavered by favoritism. Just because you are not getting what you personally want, does not mean that everyone else is wrong. There are more people wanting him unbanned as a whole and you continue to make excuses saying "Oh bribes" because you are not getting your way.if he had his twitter placed in alex's signature as an advertisement, and he was a member of the skype group the unauthorized access to his account took place in, and he posted pictures of it happening, and he didn't report any of this as it was going on, then he was involved.
you shouldn't have any say in this situation since you are friends with him, lol
the whole issue here is favoritism. a mod showing favoritism towards linux at a time like this looks really bad.
