I'm simply stating my opinion, and if you think I need to reevaluate me life because of that, you're mistaken.
Yes I know, after I posted I took out that part. It was uncalled for and extremely rude, and I apologize for that.
Don't tell me to kill myself. That's fucked up.
And no, I don't have a vendetta against him. I have an irritating anger towards how people are sticking up for him when he's been proven to be a liar, manipulative, stupid, a scammer, and someone who ddos's people, with proof he has a stresser he uses, and proof he has scammed. you can't rewrite, or fake the proof that was shown, you can't deny it, you cant explain it.
Also, post reported.
If you really can't find a way to counter a claim without telling them to go kill themselves, you should back the fuck out. And so what that he helped with security? He's still a scammer and broke multiple rules. If he gets unbanned, every single scammer should be unbanned as well. Now please, respond with telling me to go "fuck myself" or "kill yourself".
If you'd read over, I did provide counter-claims, and I was very angry he told me I needed to re-evaluate life. Before you jump to conclusions, read over the entire post and realize I did put counterclaims. It's not like I just replied with "kill yourself" and in addition to that I apologized and stopped arguing with him for the reason I was putting anger before logic. I take responsibility for what I said, but I think it's uncalled for for you of all people to come out of here and tell me what I'm saying is wrong, considering I did provide counter-claims & didn't reply with a go "fuck yourself" or "kill yourself"
Then control your anger. And I technically never said you never supplied counterarguments, I was referring to that specific one.
You said
. And did I not get a hold of my anger? I immediately apologized for the comment and removed it from my post.
I said this in a PM:
I wasn't aware of this side of the story.Linux had THREE MONTHS to say his side of the story. Don't give me that. I was banned. for THREE MONTHS, because of him. He had opened another thread saying he owned my account, probably his 4th or 5th thread. saying he is selling it, saying pm him for it. And I got so angry I spammed it with this photo:
And Mick banned me, for three months, and gave me 4 bullshit fake ass excuse reasons as to why I was banned.
And to where I spent my three months explaining to every staff member I could on skype what had happened, with every bit of proof. I had to show every detail, every image, I have four text documents on my desktop called mick1.txt mick2.txt mick3.txt and mick4.txt, I saved because I had posted on an alt MCM account and I knew the posts would be deleted. the threads I posted saying my story were deleted 3 times. I had multiple group chats with Linux and Mick and Anthony And Corey and Kaoz.
Mick shut it down every time, and refused to help me.
Where was Linux? What did he do while I was banned? He did nothing. He showed nothing. He refused to show any proof. and said "pm me private group chat I'll show you proof". And would never say it in the open, he knows that anything he can manipulate would be better shown in private where it won't be bashed or disproved. He is a liar.
He won't show anything public. So how about you show me his side of the story? Can you? So I can tear it apart and show you more proof? or show you his lies?
I spend my work on skype daily. And can rarely open my old skypes because of how much shit my main.db (Conversation history) from it holds it lags my skype and I have to switch every half a year. And I don't delete any messages, Except for one, it which was probably just a random message. I always save everything.
So please, prove me wrong. When I've been to the end of the earth and back, and have all this shown, and no one has any proof FOR Linux, and not even Linux, has any proof to defend himself.
we got a butt buddy over here
