Should we keep Threadloom?

[Mick]

Just over a week ago, we introduced Threadloom.com to try out and see what users think. This is now going to be a vote of whether you like the new search system or not and please leave feedback below. If we do keep Threadloom we are also able to make changes to make it better.

You can see a comparison between the two search systems here: http://www.mc-market.org/threadloom/demo?query=minecraft

Agree if you think we should keep Threadloom, disagree if you think we should remove it.

Please give feedback based on your decision! Thanks

 

[wavy]

I personally find it hard to find users quickly.

 

[YourPanda]

50 disagrees already time to remove it Mick lol

 

[Mick]

50 disagrees already time to remove it Mick lol

Gonna give it a day or so longer. Want more feedback about why the system needs improvement.

 

[YourPanda]

Gonna give it a day or so longer. Want more feedback about why the system needs improvement.

Understandable.

 

[Picturesque]

I’m surprised no one has mentioned this

The old system used to cover pms but Threadloom does not which makes it viciously time consuming for me to go to conversation search when I could’ve found out about something specific In pms from the search bar. Clicking on profiles is a must for me as well threadloom doesn’t make that easy.

Edit: someone did mention this I overlooked it whoops but I’ll just +1 on it getting removed and +1 the reason why

 

[Projecki]

Please god no remove that shit

 

[Picturesque]

When I meant +1 I meant +1 on it being removed sorry for any confusion.

 

[Zalbus]

Just over a week ago, we introduced Threadloom.com to try out and see what users think. This is now going to be a vote of whether you like the new search system or not and please leave feedback below. If we do keep Threadloom we are also able to make changes to make it better.

You can see a comparison between the two search systems here: http://www.mc-market.org/threadloom/demo?query=minecraft

Agree if you think we should keep Threadloom, disagree if you think we should remove it.

Please give feedback based on your decision! Thanks

It's more harder to find stuff for a example if I want to find a profile I have to click all these buttons

I like the normal search.

 

[Jerry]

I’m surprised no one has mentioned this

The old system used to cover pms but Threadloom does not which makes it viciously time consuming for me to go to conversation search when I could’ve found out about something specific In pms from the search bar. Clicking on profiles is a must for me as well threadloom doesn’t make that easy.

Edit: someone did mention this I overlooked it whoops but I’ll just +1 on it getting removed and +1 the reason why

If you're searching for something in PMs, use the search tab when you open 'All Conversations'

 

[Picturesque]

“viciously time consuming for me to go to conversation“
I think you forgot to read this part but thanks for the comment

If you're searching for something in PMs, use the search tab when you open 'All Conversations'

 

[Jerry]

“viciously time consuming for me to go to conversation“
I think you forgot to read this part but thanks for the comment

Sorry, missed that

 

[Choo]

Revert back to the old system if you haven't already, it was way more efficient.

 

[Max]

Every time I go to search for something, I see the threadloom thing and I think to myself "AAAAAAAAAAA WHAT IS THIS GET RID IF IT NOW!!!" But yeah it's visually disgusting and it doesn't search through everything and it's extremely weird. It looks like a poor attempt of a "modern search system" that failed horribly. Remove it ASAP!

Thx

 

[BrianGrug]

It may look nicer but it’s not as good as the old one

 

[Igneous]

Remove it please!

 

[ZACK]

90 Disagrees

 

[Kaito]

I highly suggest removing it, as you can see by the reactions; the majority of people agree with me.

 

[xLucas]

100 Disagrees

I also don't like it, way too confusing and looks bad imo.

 

[PnsDev]

I think that the new one is more "fancy" but I do prefer the old one due to how quick and efficient it was.