Tablist

[LillianA]

Source: https://github.com/selyuorg/Tablist

theres and example there

 

[Fustom]

I would recommend you use Lombok to do your getters and setters in the api portion it makes your code a lot cleaner. It also could reduce load time because the code is cleaner.

 

[LillianA]

I would recommend you use Lombok to do your getters and setters in the api portion it makes your code a lot cleaner. It also could reduce load time because the code is cleaner.

I use lombok in only private projects, I won't use it in public ones. Also what do you mean "reduce load time" lombok generates getters/setters at compile time. (or at least I believe it does, either way it shouldn't reduce anything as the output jar contains all of the getters/setters)

 

[PTech]

So normally I don't tend to point this stuff out but this was pretty blatant. This is legitimately a skidded version of an OLD release of Ziggurat (new version is alot better than this shit). Don't believe me? Went back to an old commit and compared some of the lines...

In short, this user doesn't have my permission to release this or modify it in anyway. Don't steal my shit

You're so mad somebody open sourced a tab library you have to cherry pick lines that look like yours to accuse her of skidding.
Ziggurat isn't special. Your technique of handling tab manipulation isn't special either. Go the fuck away LOL[DOUBLEPOST=1570957207][/DOUBLEPOST]

I would recommend you use Lombok to do your getters and setters in the api portion it makes your code a lot cleaner. It also could reduce load time because the code is cleaner.

That's incorrect. It doesn't reduce load times. It literally compiles to getters and setters. It's just there to make code cleaner, and due to IDE support, using it in an open source project is a terrible idea.

 

[DarkKnights22]

So normally I don't tend to point this stuff out but this was pretty blatant. This is legitimately a skidded version of an OLD release of Ziggurat (new version is alot better than this shit). Don't believe me? Went back to an old commit and compared some of the lines...

In short, this user doesn't have my permission to release this or modify it in anyway. Don't steal my shit

lol you rekt him up

 

[PTech]

lol you :rekt: him up

Okay darkknights22 professional java developer

 

[DarkKnights22]

Okay darkknights22 professional java developer

Indeed PTech, indeed.

 

[Ally]

lol you :rekt: him up

sammmmy's handpicked, super-focused code is beyond insanely petty - it's practically baseless, especially given the last example where it's practically impossible to "skid" (???). In fact I'd argue LillianA's code is much cleaner and provides a much better structure given the task at hand - which, may I remind you both, is niche and therefore is hard to identify an alternative in code (which therefore means all code therein will look especially similar). The statement the user produced is biased because it identifies different portions in both sets of code which may or may not be actually comparable - rendering the point baseless (and invalid by extension). So they "rekt him"? No mate. You just made yourselves look foolish beyond belief.

 

[PTech]

Indeed PTech, indeed.

you're not a very good developer if you just dick suck without looking at the bigger picture.

 

[DarkKnights22]

sammmmy's handpicked, super-focused code is beyond insanely petty - it's practically baseless, especially given the last example where it's practically impossible to "skid" (???). In fact I'd argue LillianA's code is much cleaner and provides a much better structure given the task at hand - which, may I remind you both, is niche and therefore is hard to identify an alternative in code (which therefore means all code therein will look especially similar). The statement the user produced is biased because it identifies different portions in both sets of code which may or may not be actually comparable - rendering the point baseless (and invalid by extension). So they ":rekt: him"? No mate. You just made yourselves look foolish beyond belief.

Yes I got rekt

 

[FileRunner]

Imagine releasing a skidded a tabapi smh

 

[Ally]

Imagine releasing a skidded a tabapi smh

Imagine not being able to read and blindly believing an incompetent developer's baseless slander.

sammmmy's handpicked, super-focused code is beyond insanely petty - it's practically baseless, especially given the last example where it's practically impossible to "skid" (???). In fact I'd argue LillianA's code is much cleaner and provides a much better structure given the task at hand - which, may I remind you both, is niche and therefore is hard to identify an alternative in code (which therefore means all code therein will look especially similar). The statement the user produced is biased because it identifies different portions in both sets of code which may or may not be actually comparable - rendering the point baseless (and invalid by extension). So they ":rekt: him"? No mate. You just made yourselves look foolish beyond belief.

You're so mad somebody open sourced a tab library you have to cherry pick lines that look like yours to accuse her of skidding.
Ziggurat isn't special. Your technique of handling tab manipulation isn't special either. Go the fuck away LOL[DOUBLEPOST=1570957207][/DOUBLEPOST]
That's incorrect. It doesn't reduce load times. It literally compiles to getters and setters. It's just there to make code cleaner, and due to IDE support, using it in an open source project is a terrible idea.

 

[T3quila]

This is funny lol

 

[Trendingz]

Imagine arguing

 

[kev626]

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Can you explain the point of this line sammmmy?