This Is Bothering Me..

[Benton]

Everyone is releasing auto clickers claiming to be undetectable and the best auto clicker out there and all that jazz but TBH. Making an auto clicker isn't too hard to do and of course, it's not gonna be detected yet because It's not big yet and just some random auto clicker so people aren't gonna be looking for it. Just something that bothered me lol. You might as well say every auto clicker is undetectable. I never made an auto clicker before but I would think the only thing you'll have to do is run a loop while the left mouse button is being held down to make the loop fire a left-click action everytime a loop completes itself. I bet I could watch 6-7 videos on the basics of C++ and make my own auto clicker.

 

[AdamEdits]

Everyone is releasing auto clickers claiming to be undetectable and the best auto clicker out there and all that jazz but TBH. Making an auto clicker isn't too hard to do and of course, it's not gonna be detected yet because It's not big yet and just some random auto clicker so people aren't gonna be looking for it. Just something that bothered me lol. You might as well say every auto clicker is undetectable. I never made an auto clicker before but I would think the only thing you'll have to do is run a loop while the left mouse button is being held down to make the loop fire a left-click action everytime a loop completes itself.

i can literally use a free one and it works just as fine as a free one

 

[Brazy]

i mean, kinda like how people use clickbait to get views. if they use buzz words like "undetectable" and shit like that, of course they will make money like that.

 

[Ally]

Different algorithms = different ways of bypassing things. What matters in an autoclicker is how you hide it, not the fact you've hidden it. And yes everything is detectable, but the degrees of detectability vary, meaning many autoclickers can be virtually undetectable.

Personally I just hide stuff behind a fake UI. Best thing you can do nowadays since the autoclicker algorithms are pretty simple to get down pat. More effort = harder to detect.

 

[Ted]

There are free auto clickers out there that I know of that bypass every check on Code 66, and bypass Last Activity Viewer, and Process Hacker.
It's an old one too! Been around for years.

 

[roy]

Hey, if you want me to take a dump in a box and mark it guaranteed, I will. I got spare time. But for now, for your customer's sake, for your daughter's sake, ya might wanna think about buying a quality product from me.

It is as simple as that semi-famous movie quote.
All the word "undetected" means is that you just bought something that hasn't been detected as malicious, illegal etc.
The word "undetected" does not mean you bought something that actually works correctly.

 

[Choo]

Everyone is releasing auto clickers claiming to be undetectable and the best auto clicker out there and all that jazz but TBH. Making an auto clicker isn't too hard to do and of course, it's not gonna be detected yet because It's not big yet and just some random auto clicker so people aren't gonna be looking for it. Just something that bothered me lol. You might as well say every auto clicker is undetectable. I never made an auto clicker before but I would think the only thing you'll have to do is run a loop while the left mouse button is being held down to make the loop fire a left-click action everytime a loop completes itself. I bet I could watch 6-7 videos on the basics of C++ and make my own auto clicker.

All the autoclickers I've seen so far on MCM have the exact GUI and Layout they just have a different color palette and name.

 

[n0tzach]

Business is business

 

[TrentS]

Someone code one and give it out for free. RIP EVERYONE SELLING!!!!!1