Updating blacked out reputation to make it comply with the current rules doesn't make it "un-blacked out", despite using the new format (from the old format).
- Type
- Bug report
- Status
- Implemented
Updating "blacked out" rep.
- Thread starter Ally
- Start date
- Status
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.
Unless I'm mistaken and reading this thread wrong, all of your blacked out reputation is from banned members (as it should be). Only banned members' given reputation is blacked out, those from the legacy reputation system are either removed (I think the removal happened already) or are just invalid but not reported.
Yes I still don't understand this. They did a legitimate deal, then the user got banned for something else. The rep is still there of the legitimate deal with proof of the deal making all the proof and the deal fully VALID. Yes I understand that the banner member can't edit the rep they have given to you, if they didn't add proof or something was wrong. On the ones that actually are valid and have all the proof there, should fucking stay.
I'm not talking about mine. I had a rep on someone else that didn't comply with the new system's standards and it was blacked out. I updated it, and it's still blacked out despite complying with the new system.
Send me a pm with the link?
Back about a year ago we introduced some pretty radical changes to the way that we handle reputation. We made all reputation left by banned members be marked as uncounted in your reputation totals and disabled the reporting functionality to reduce abuse and targeted. The changes that we made were certainly controversial at the time, but looking back I'm a firm believer that the changes we made back then were the best that we could have made.
Our reputation system is very far from being perfect in its current state, and we fully recognise that. Since it's introduction we've changed many policies and spent countless hours developing new custom systems, such as disputing feedback.
At the moment we aren't planning to do any more development for our site until we can migrate to XF2. We're also not going to be making any changes to our policies surrounding reputation. Our system is stable at the moment, and making a change now when we're going to be redeveloping everything shortly isn't beneficial. Perhaps once we move to XF2 and have fixed all the bugs that come with that and have more time for some new development and to consider the impact that instituting new policies will result in.
Until then, I'll move this to denied. Once we migrate to XF2 if you feel that this is still relevant please create a new suggestion thread and we can look into it once again. Thank you to everyone for your support and criticism of our systems, it is definitely the best way for us to improve.
Thank you,
Our reputation system is very far from being perfect in its current state, and we fully recognise that. Since it's introduction we've changed many policies and spent countless hours developing new custom systems, such as disputing feedback.
At the moment we aren't planning to do any more development for our site until we can migrate to XF2. We're also not going to be making any changes to our policies surrounding reputation. Our system is stable at the moment, and making a change now when we're going to be redeveloping everything shortly isn't beneficial. Perhaps once we move to XF2 and have fixed all the bugs that come with that and have more time for some new development and to consider the impact that instituting new policies will result in.
Until then, I'll move this to denied. Once we migrate to XF2 if you feel that this is still relevant please create a new suggestion thread and we can look into it once again. Thank you to everyone for your support and criticism of our systems, it is definitely the best way for us to improve.
Thank you,
- Status
