Voice Scam Reports

Status

FisherGee

i like buying servers
Supreme
Feedback score
178
Posts
1,915
Reactions
646
Resources
0
The scam reports moderators should ask for voice scam reports after the report is made. If agreed on by both sides, there should be an organized call and it should be solved within that day.

Problems with the current system:
Too slow
Changing scam report mods frequently
Vague responses by both parties (inefficient)
etc
 
Type
Suggestion
Status
Denied
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.

Violet

anime
Supreme
Feedback score
252
Posts
2,098
Reactions
1,817
Resources
0
That’s just more evidence. And I said if it’s agreed on.[DOUBLEPOST=1569933471][/DOUBLEPOST]
Can someone just walk out in the middle of a court case during questioning without some sort of punishment or bias?
The difference here is so huge, you're scamming someone on a minecraft forum and getting a ban. You can literally do anything on the web without getting caught. I mean if the deal was huge like $10k+ and you got all info you could take it to court, it would be more serious then. This whole voice thing would never work out, would just be 2 people arguing about some stupid fucking bullshit.
 

DarkKnights22

Professional Java Developer
Supreme
Feedback score
17
Posts
1,021
Reactions
350
Resources
14
A voice scam report would put immense pressure on scam resolvers.
  • Resolvers won’t have any transcribed archives to efficiently refer back to. Listening to a voice archive over and over again to recall details would be even more inefficient than reading a report.
  • The scam resolvers, party A and party B would all have to be present at the same time. Scheduling calls would take even more effort since timezone differences or just IRL commitments may make it difficult for all parties to congregate (common on an online forum). In contrary, responses to reports in written format can be done at anyone’s convenience.
  • Resolvers may not always be able to make a decision on the spot in a single call. Sometimes, they may need time to mull over it or discuss with other staff members. Scheduling another call just exaggerates the issues above.
All in all, it’s less efficient for everyone involved. Not more.
Definitely agree with this.
 

Mick

BuiltByBit Owner
Management
Feedback score
28
Posts
6,412
Reactions
7,667
Resources
0
A voice scam report would put immense pressure on scam resolvers.
  • Resolvers won’t have any transcribed archives to efficiently refer back to. Listening to a voice archive over and over again to recall details would be even more inefficient than reading a report.
  • The scam resolvers, party A and party B would all have to be present at the same time. Scheduling calls would take even more effort since timezone differences or just IRL commitments may make it difficult for all parties to congregate (common on an online forum). In contrary, responses to reports in written format can be done at anyone’s convenience.
  • Resolvers may not always be able to make a decision on the spot in a single call. Sometimes, they may need time to mull over it or discuss with other staff members. Scheduling another call just exaggerates the issues above.
All in all, it’s less efficient for everyone involved. Not more.
Denied, thanks for the suggestion
 
Status
Top