Funkel you're never going to get a straight answer, I recommend searching other threads similar to this (Theres been hundreds) and seeing what people have been saying. No point in repeating this argument a 1000 times.
Creative Security was always nice when it was around. It was easy to setup, had loads of configuration options, blocked all grades of hacks, the dev was very responsive and added load of essential type features to the game. RIP Creative Security
NCP easily leads in movement checks and serves as a great budget friendly option. Additionally, I added several custom combat checks and plan to upload an updated combat video to display the hours spend put into improving, new and existing, checks in the near future.
It really depends on your own intelligence. A lot of public anti-cheats are pretty solid, though it requires a certain level of knowledge and intelligence on the user's end to actual read the logs and understand what is a legitimate violation and what is a false positive caused by lag, plugins, non-vanilla clients, or other factors. The misconception about false positives is that it means an anti-cheat is bad, but it actually is doing its job. Most false positives are caused by lag, meaning the player does actually appear to be violating a check, but it is only due to lag, and this is something a non machine learning AC cannot understand or detect.
The best anti-cheats will always be custom-made and privately owned as they are tailored to their operating server. An Anticheat like Watchdog or GCheat would not work on cosmicpvp, due to the number of custom features and abilities on the server not present in vanilla Minecraft.
Overall, it depends on what you need it for. Find an anti-cheat that fits your budget and then test it yourself, find out what it detects properly and what it false positives on and learn to read the logs it produces correctly. If you do all of those steps properly, any well-made anticheat will function just fine.
My opinion is too get a custom anti-cheat, it helps a lot in the long run and will be 10x more reliable.
Status
This thread has been locked.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.