It's a few big servers anticheats, i wanted to know what server's checks (fly, etc) is better then the other ones
the "CBClient" isn't cheatbreaker its my own client like cheatbreaker, and its not for the client lol it's for the anticheat i have "reaper"[DOUBLEPOST=1523269424][/DOUBLEPOST]If that's the real cheatbreaker (doubt it), you wouldn't be able to use the checks in a plugin since cheatbreaker is it's own Minecraft version.
Plus cheatbreaker is prob made in Electron+nodejs+vue, mine is made in Java and JavaFXIf that's the real cheatbreaker (doubt it), you wouldn't be able to use the checks in a plugin since cheatbreaker is it's own Minecraft version.
yeah i was thinking the same lolWhat the..?
but there would be like 20 autoclicker, reach, fly, speed checks lolUse all the checks, idk which is better so use all of them. BAM
Try both anticheats and see what checks go off firstbut there would be like 20 autoclicker, reach, fly, speed checks lol
tbh they are both pretty equalTry both anticheats and see what checks go off first
the "CBClient" isn't cheatbreaker its my own client like cheatbreaker, and its not for the client lol it's for the anticheat i have "reaper"[DOUBLEPOST=1523269424][/DOUBLEPOST]
Plus cheatbreaker is prob made in Electron+nodejs+vue, mine is made in Java and JavaFX
it's not even out how would you know?Cheatbreaker does 100% not use an JS iframe it's any of C languages.
it's not even out how would you know?
the funny part is that Cheatbreaker is claiming zonix stole code from cheatbreaker but ik zonix client was made in electron+vue+nodejs, so how would zonix steal code from cheatbreaker if they weren't even made in the same language??Cause JS is not for building native apps.
