Abolishing the 13 years of age rule

Status

root

Supreme
Feedback score
30
Posts
655
Reactions
309
Resources
0
Hello, MC-Market.

I am making a suggestion due to one of my fellow Slashy_Hosting members being banned and I am annoyed at it to be honest, I am fed up with discrimination from appearance.

A recent example being PurpleStorms he was banned for "being underage" when I speak to one of the staff members the reason has reveled that they had not solid proof...
The proof behind the ban was `his appearance`

You may not trust me on this issue but I do have proof backing my end of support on this situation and I shall be providing it now, http://prntscr.com/fr7mxd

I don't want it completely abolished just make it so staff are aware that you need solid proof or a confession
YXa1cKYOTveyUablTNwPOA.png


I will not be naming the staff member who banned him as you can find that yourself but I would not like to start a war with staff on this issue.

If you are a community member please vote freely.
If you are a staff member please comment below with a detailed explanation on your judgement.

EDIT:
ALERT
Sorry, The title is worded wrong. It should be `Unpunished users with invalid proof`

Regards,
root
 
Type
Suggestion
Status
Denied
Last edited:
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.

Aekalix

Terraforming Connoisseur
Premium
Feedback score
46
Posts
1,725
Reactions
1,264
Resources
0
If the user was banned on indirect proof then he should be unbanned. Someone could have a disease which makes them look younger or whatever. If there was no proof but just his appearance then IMO that is just plain wrong.

We do not ban the user that seemed like he scammed someone because he was actually being impersonated by another user. It appeared like the user who was impersonated scammed someone, but he actually didn't.. Right?
 
Last edited:

moon10k

| Trailer Maker |
Supreme
Feedback score
24
Posts
3,733
Reactions
2,949
Resources
0
Woah, never thought staff would ban someone for "looking young". To be honest, that disgusts me.
 

root

Supreme
Feedback score
30
Posts
655
Reactions
309
Resources
0
I thought a confession was already required? If staff are banning members based on profile pic alone, that's messed up.
That is what I mean they are banning him on what he looks like for all they know he has anxiety and thinks he has a bad self-image. They could trigger a panic attack or worse, Luckily he does not but it could have been a possibility.

Woah, never thought staff would ban someone for "looking young". To be honest, that disgusts me.
I possibly know the reporting user.

ALSO TRY NOT TO INSULT THE STAFF TEAM. They do a great job but may have slipups I know that this is a small issue but please dont over react because then the staff will react badly and this suggestion shall be denied.
 

J A M E S

· entrepreneur ·
Supreme
Feedback score
19
Posts
406
Reactions
118
Resources
1
PurpleStorms was like 11. He begged me to join his build team, and when I joined a discord call with him, he sounded like he was 9. His voice was so high pitched. You can obviously tell he is not 13+. There's your "solid proof".
 

Theo J

Entrepreneur | IB/CS Student
Supreme
Feedback score
38
Posts
1,405
Reactions
960
Resources
0
PurpleStorms was like 11. He begged me to join his build team, and when I joined a discord call with him, he sounded like he was 9. His voice was so high pitched. You can obviously tell he is not 13+. There's your "solid proof".
He also was super immature when posting here.
 

Aekalix

Terraforming Connoisseur
Premium
Feedback score
46
Posts
1,725
Reactions
1,264
Resources
0
PurpleStorms was like 11. He begged me to join his build team, and when I joined a discord call with him, he sounded like he was 9. His voice was so high pitched. You can obviously tell he is not 13+. There's your "solid proof".
Still not solid proof. Then I can just report everyone because it appears to me that user did...
 

root

Supreme
Feedback score
30
Posts
655
Reactions
309
Resources
0
PurpleStorms was like 11. He begged me to join his build team, and when I joined a discord call with him, he sounded like he was 9. His voice was so high pitched. You can obviously tell he is not 13+. There's your "solid proof".
Wow... He has not been through puberty so he MUST be underaged. I know people who are 13 who have not been through it soo.... Should we ban them also?

He also was super immature when posting here.
As stated above he has not fully matured yet due to not going through puberty.
 

Theo J

Entrepreneur | IB/CS Student
Supreme
Feedback score
38
Posts
1,405
Reactions
960
Resources
0
Wow... He has not been through puberty so he MUST be underaged. I know people who are 13 who have not been through it soo.... Should we ban them also?


As stated above he has not fully matured yet due to not going through puberty.
His McM age was 17 years old and he sounds like a squeaker? Sorry right. He's 17 and hasn't gone through puberty
 

Aekalix

Terraforming Connoisseur
Premium
Feedback score
46
Posts
1,725
Reactions
1,264
Resources
0
His McM age was 17 years old and he sounds like a squeaker? Sorry right. He's 17 and hasn't gone through puberty
Alright so morraly speaking everyone thought that he was under 13, but we do not know for sure.. If there is any doubt you should not ban him.. That's just wrong. Either get direct proof or don't act.
 

root

Supreme
Feedback score
30
Posts
655
Reactions
309
Resources
0
His McM age was 17 years old and he sounds like a squeaker? Sorry right. He's 17 and hasn't gone through puberty
Did he ever claim to be 17? Other than his profile age, Do you really think that every member has the correct age there? Or are we just banning for a profile age... Just remember all people under 13 are over 18 online...
 

Theo J

Entrepreneur | IB/CS Student
Supreme
Feedback score
38
Posts
1,405
Reactions
960
Resources
0
Did he ever claim to be 17? Other than his profile age, Do you really think that every member has the correct age there? Or are we just banning for a profile age... Just remember all people under 13 are over 18 online...
My point is, why lie about your age if you're old enough to be signed up? Not only that, if privacy is an issue, you sign up with the right age, then make it private.
 

root

Supreme
Feedback score
30
Posts
655
Reactions
309
Resources
0
Also this started because he looks and sounds underage...
Explain this [DOUBLEPOST=1499112783][/DOUBLEPOST]
My point is, why lie about your age if you're old enough to be signed up? Not only that, if privacy is an issue, you sign up with the right age, then make it private.
Staff can still see it he may possibly want to keep it fully private.
 

Taiga

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Supreme
Feedback score
6
Posts
614
Reactions
984
Resources
0
The forum has a obligation to act toward a law. If they have a clear suspicion that someone is younger then 13, then it's better for the staff to ban that person, rather then take the possible consequence. I'm pretty sure that he can prove his real age with a staff through webcam ID if he wishes to get back in.
 

Junction

Previously j9c2d / Lustily
Premium
Feedback score
23
Posts
279
Reactions
101
Resources
0
Im not sure. People who are young are generally inexperienced in websites which involve money alike this one and can sometimes be immature. The website, I guess, is trying to be as professional as possible and being younger than 13 may bring issues. This can sometimes involve being scammed or bullied etc. This for obvious reasons and is something that the owners would like to strive away from as it prevents hassle for them and the staff team aswell as the actual kid himself. This being said as it is attempting to be as professional as possible in a minecraft community this situation could've been dealt better. It is hard to see a very matured 12 year old and usually they cant uphold that visage for ever.

However, I do believe judging someone's appearance shouldn't determine their age, this isnt right as I know and understand that feeling as I look very young for my age. The action of banning him should only have taken place once the staff team had sufficient evidence to back themselves up against threads like these. This is a very hot topic but im sure once the staff team reply, they will have some sort of evidence which is deemed sufficient as I dont think a website of such caliber would make such a rookie mistake :)
 
Status
Top