Let me try and keep it all short.
My suggestion is to allow the sale of CS2 Skins given Steam/Valve's ambiguous stance. Mick hinted at TOS complexities, though it may have been an offhand remark - in case it was not, I think it's important to be consistent with this approach. Below is an example of where TOS complexities have not stopped specific cases.
Example:
- Accounts on platforms where you don’t own the platform - On BBB, the sale of YouTube brand transfers is permitted. While this doesn't involve direct account transactions, it achieves a similar outcome. YouTube hasn't officially authorised the sale of brand accounts and has indicated that account recovery isn't guaranteed, meaning there is similar uncertainty when compared to Valve and CS2 Skins.
If the comment was truly passive, I would appreciate a reasonable explanation as there might be connections I haven't considered. While I'm not heavily involved with CS2 Skins, I think it would be cool to see CS2 skins being sold directly on-site.
My suggestion is to allow the sale of CS2 Skins given Steam/Valve's ambiguous stance. Mick hinted at TOS complexities, though it may have been an offhand remark - in case it was not, I think it's important to be consistent with this approach. Below is an example of where TOS complexities have not stopped specific cases.
- Accounts on platforms where you don’t own the platform - On BBB, the sale of YouTube brand transfers is permitted. While this doesn't involve direct account transactions, it achieves a similar outcome. YouTube hasn't officially authorised the sale of brand accounts and has indicated that account recovery isn't guaranteed, meaning there is similar uncertainty when compared to Valve and CS2 Skins.
If the comment was truly passive, I would appreciate a reasonable explanation as there might be connections I haven't considered. While I'm not heavily involved with CS2 Skins, I think it would be cool to see CS2 skins being sold directly on-site.
- Type
- Suggestion
Last edited:
