There's an "Agree" button for a reasonGreat idea. +1
There's an "Agree" button for a reason
Are ya'll blind?usetheagreebutton.com
Usetheagreereaction.jpgThis sounds somewhat reasonable. Regardless if it is positive or negative, a banned member is no longer part of the community and hence we would view it to be irrelevant. Automating simple repetitive actions that moderators handle sounds quite helpful in terms of reducing our workload.
Only issue I can see with this is if a user gets unbanned. Perhaps then, we would need to have an exception to add all reputation back. Not something particularly difficult to implement.
Okay blockhead.This random named coat gave me a neg then got banned![]()
Coat wins! DING DING DINGG DINGYeah staff actually won’t remove his rep from me.
Coat wins! DING DING DINGG DING
StopYeah staff actually won’t remove his rep from me.
AllIf you are referring to positive reputation, I don't support this idea. Users can be on this site for over a year and decide to exit scam. So should all the reputation he/she gave out be disregarded?
Positive tooIf you agree to have neg rep removed, then you should agree to have pos rep removed. I feel like the only reason people would agree with this is so a few of their neg reps could get removed and their rep could look more clean.
All reputation is removed if a member is banned, regardless of type. Justis would be able to talk to you about the reasoning behind it, as I believe I touched on the idea in a suggestion once.If you are referring to positive reputation, I don't support this idea. Users can be on this site for over a year and decide to exit scam. So should all the reputation he/she gave out be disregarded?
