Dedicated Rep Review Staff

[Satan]

Posting this after I saw TBK saying this as shown below



MCM Should promote active "no-life" users of this forum to have the sole task of reviewing reputation reports so false reputations can be removed faster and repeat offenders can be warned.

"No-Life" meaning that these users are insanely active and are almost always online on MCM. Idk how many users there are like this, but I'm sure there are many and enough so that MCM won't need 20 reviewers to handle reports and such.

This suggestion DOES NOT forbid current staff members from doing this duty as well but rather view these new Dedicated Rep Reviewers as support staff to the current staff of MCM.

 

[Pyr0]

Who would fill these positions? Like, I'm talking examples. It'd help your case rather then just saying "Someone".

 

[Flipora]

This will be deleted and you will receive a warning for suggesting new staff members be added better remove it yourself to make it so that you don't get a warning point and remake this to say what everyone else has been saying about current staff members doing this when they really all mean this but they don't want warnings

 

[Satan]

YES

http://usetheagreebutton.com

This will be deleted and you will receive a warning for suggesting new staff members be added better remove it yourself to make it so that you don't get a warning point and remake this to say what everyone else has been saying about current staff members doing this when they really all mean this but they don't want warnings

I will receive a warning for suggesting new staff...? I did my research and didn't see any thread titles that addresses dedicated reputation staff...

Who would fill these positions? Like, I'm talking examples. It'd help your case rather then just saying "Someone".

Not sure but I'd like to believe that the current staff of MCM can see for themselves how active certain users are in terms of post frequency, thread viewing, and shoutbox activity.

 

[Flipora]

http://usetheagreebutton.com


I will receive a warning for suggesting new staff...? I did my research and didn't see any thread titles that addresses dedicated reputation staff...


Not sure but I'd like to believe that the current staff of MCM can see for themselves how active certain users are in terms of post frequency, thread viewing, and shoutbox activity.

It's just suggesting new staff being brought in in general is a very common idea. Many people want more rep staff, support, more scam report people, but a lot of people have gotten warnings for their threads like this because it is suggesting that MC-market should get new staff and that is against the rules and your thread will be denied and taken down anyway so just rephrase it so that you don't get a warning like the other guys.

 

[Satan]

It's just suggesting new staff being brought in in general is a very common idea. Many people want more rep staff, support, more scam report people, but a lot of people have gotten warnings for their threads like this because it is suggesting that MC-market should get new staff and that is against the rules and your thread will be denied and taken down anyway so just rephrase it so that you don't get a warning like the other guys.

Which rule is it against? Sorry, I'm a bit lazy to read the numerous common sense rules on a large forum like this and surprised to hear this unknown rule to me at least.

 

[Badger]

Why do all of you people always try to find new ideas to get Mick to add more staff on the site? Is it because you truly want to become staff deeply within yourself?... The site runs quite fine, just use common sense.

 

[utaninja]

Having reputations removed is a problem, having a bunch of people that got barely trained won’t help anything. If they start a role in the staff team? Fine. But to recruit 20+ people? I heavily disagree.

This is pointless overall.
We don’t need more staff, it’s fine how it is.

Everyone who agrees is likely people who want the role themselves.

 

[Satan]

Why do all of you people always try to find new ideas to get Mick to add more staff on the site? Is it because you truly want to become staff deeply within yourself?... The site runs quite fine, just use common sense.

I'm not active enough to be staff for this position, I have a life hence why if you read "No-life" in my OP you'd understand that only the most active on this site should be trusted with such a dedicated task.

How does common sense relate to anything of this thread? The issue is that false rep and repeat false repping users aren't being handled quickly enough and sometimes ignored according to other user testimonies such as the "blackmailing of getting rid of neg rep or else I'll neg rep you".

 

[Satan]

But to recruit 20+ people? I heavily disagree.

"No-Life" meaning that these users are insanely active and are almost always online on MCM. Idk how many users there are like this, but I'm sure there are many and enough so that MCM won't need 20 reviewers to handle reports and such.

[DOUBLEPOST=1516308784][/DOUBLEPOST]

Omg, that'd be awesome

http://usetheagreebutton.com

 

[utaninja]

[DOUBLEPOST=1516308784][/DOUBLEPOST]

Actually I stated my opinion if you read the whole comment.

 

[Satan]

Actually I stated my opinion if you read the whole comment.

I agree its important to read a whole comment, but I'm pointing out a detail you missed in mine.

"I'm sure there are many and enough so that MCM won't need 20 reviewers to handle reports and such."

Yet your comment assumes that MCM is going to need to get 20+ users for this position...

 

[koshr]

We don't need more staff, period. We don't need more roles, period. What we need is patient users who can wait a week or two. My suggestion is people be more patient and stop trying to cause a problem.

Thank you.

 

[Satan]

We don't need more staff, period. We don't need more roles, period. What we need is patient users who can wait a week or two. My suggestion is people be more patient and stop trying to cause a problem.

Thank you.

*looks at low reputation. Makes conjecture that this user doesn't make deals or make money that often and by that doesn't value the principle that time = money.*

Let me try to help you understand why this whole suggestion was even suggested in the first place. First of all, understand that in the real world (and the internet cuz the internet exists in the real world) the concept "time = money" is the golden rule. 1-2 weeks is 7-14 days, which translates into so many hours and minutes and seconds. Now most deals here need to happen within minutes.

Let's say a user who is interested in buying your product takes a brief glance at your reputation and sees those negatives. Let's also make the assumption that most users/customers in this case don't bother to read why the negative reputation is there, they already gain a negative bias and will most likely not deal with you in that split second decision.

There you just lost money. All because the time it takes for the current staff to remove that false reputation (another assumption that the rep is false) is too long.

 

[Flipora]

Which rule is it against? Sorry, I'm a bit lazy to read the numerous common sense rules on a large forum like this and surprised to hear this unknown rule to me at least.

1.11.1 Do not post content which suggests you or another member want to be or should be considered for staff.

 

[Satan]

1.11.1 Do not post content which suggests you or another member want to be or should be considered for staff.

Ah, well the way its worded suggests that I am making a public suggestion to make a specific user a staff member, but as you can see from the OP there is no such mentions of any users. I'm just leaving that choice up to the current staff to use their judgement in who is active on MCM but also mature enough to handle the probably flooding reports of false reps to be removed or dealt with.

 

[Flipora]

Please let us know where you see, "I want ... to be staff"? This is to suggest a staff member for reputation, nowhere does it specifically state who should be staff.

I agree but they have been enforcing it as anyone who suggests new staff members gets a warning for this.