delete

PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.

ida64

Supreme
Feedback score
10
Posts
207
Reactions
204
Resources
0

Offtopic: Hey, when you finishing OITQ? :)

Ontopic: A simple response to everyone asking why there are so many small checks, It's easier to maintain. Example, instead of having one generic movement check like NoCheatPlus does and having to figure out which part is broken and causing issues, users can say "Hey! Fly E is causing some issues when moving around in water, could you look into it?" That saves me a ton of time since I won't have to go look thru a huge file and try to find out which part is causing the issue, instead I can look thru a smaller file and know exactly where the issue is and fix it quicker.

Hope this explains it, if there are any grammar mistakes or typos, excuse me. It's 8am.
 
Last edited:

Beb

Developer, formerly for MMC and Glade
Supreme
Feedback score
9
Posts
7
Reactions
19
Resources
0
Hey, when you finishing OITQ?
Was right before I left MMC. I see you haven't changed at all, still toxic and bringing up old stuff. How's your anticheat going? Still got 15 crappy killaura checks?

A simple response to everyone asking why there are so many small checks, It's easier to maintain. Example, instead of having one generic movement check like NoCheatPlus does and having to figure out which part is broken and causing issues, users can say "Hey! Fly E is causing some issues when moving around in water, could you look into it?" That saves me a ton of time since I won't have to go look thru a huge file and try to find out which part is causing the issue, instead I can look thru a smaller file and know exactly where the issue is and fix it quicker.
Learn to use a debugger.
 

Lulux

I like computers
Premium
Feedback score
2
Posts
106
Reactions
86
Resources
0
Was right before I left MMC. I see you haven't changed at all, still toxic and bringing up old stuff. How's your anticheat going? Still got 15 crappy killaura checks?


Learn to use a debugger.
You never tested the anticheat and called it "trash" and why are you that toxic, everyone responded without insulting you they only answered your questions you had... You are very stubborn.
 
Last edited:

Rages

Java Developer
Supreme
Feedback score
1
Posts
32
Reactions
55
Resources
6
Glad to see everyone noticing the unnecessary classes for each module :)
 

Beb

Developer, formerly for MMC and Glade
Supreme
Feedback score
9
Posts
7
Reactions
19
Resources
0
You never tested the anticheat and called it "trash"
I can tell based on the amount of fly checks alone that this anticheat is not properly made. I didn't call it trash, I only called the fifteen killaura checks "crappy."

why are you that toxic
Toxicity brews toxicity. Ask ida why he started brewing, though I just assume it to be who he is as a person.

everyone responded without insulting they only answered your questions you had
I had no questions, please go back and read the thread. I'm done on this thread, there is nothing more to say if people don't plan on reading the series of posts which happened.
Have a nice day.
 

ida64

Supreme
Feedback score
10
Posts
207
Reactions
204
Resources
0

Lets see your anti-cheat then, feel free to school me on how an anti-cheat should be made.

If you have any questions or concerns, please message me and don't fill up my thread with useless arguments. Thanks.
 

Beb

Developer, formerly for MMC and Glade
Supreme
Feedback score
9
Posts
7
Reactions
19
Resources
0
Lets see your anti-cheat then, feel free to school me on how an anti-cheat should be made.
Alright, I'll go make one to show you how it is done.
 

TheGGAccount

Feedback score
7
Posts
273
Reactions
66
Resources
0
It's standard practice (for any programming) to use the Single Responsibility principle, where each class only has one responsibility. You'd be a messy and stupid developer to not follow that principle, and having seperate checks follows it.

That's all, I won't be interfering anymore.
 
Last edited:

One Addictions

Feedback score
0
Posts
19
Reactions
13
Resources
0
Ngl this ac don't look half bad, but 5 speed checks and 11 fly checks? That is very unnecessary, you can easily detect every speed with 2 checks. Also why is there 2 reach checks? You only need one of them. But besides that, it don't look bad.
 

ida64

Supreme
Feedback score
10
Posts
207
Reactions
204
Resources
0
Ngl this ac don't look half bad, but 5 speed checks and 11 fly checks? That is very unnecessary, you can easily detect every speed with 2 checks. Also why is there 2 reach checks? You only need one of them. But besides that, it don't look bad.
If you have the perfection friction speed check then sure, but if you believe that your 2 speed checks will work completely fine on a live server then you're quite wrong. Our 5 speed checks contains a normal friction speed check, strafe (ground + air), omnisprint and a invalid direction speed check. Our 11 fly checks are completely understandable as they also contain stuff for no fall and step. The 2 reach checks are because we have 1 reach check for attack and then the other one is for interaction
 

Tusky

Feedback score
0
Posts
108
Reactions
27
Resources
0
I mean, yeah theres lots of anticheats around that range that are non-exclusive, for example, verus
overflow too
 

Tusky

Feedback score
0
Posts
108
Reactions
27
Resources
0
I dont know a lot of anticheats, so I never heard about that one
heard its skidded and tps go boomboom on 10 players (by boomboom i mean 0)



take it back l0l
 
Last edited:
Top