Hiring best developers familiar with PvP editing
- Thread starter TheHighFly
- Start date
- Status
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.
OOP has a very strict design pattern and holding singletons with static does not fit in that pattern and it is conventional in Java to follow the OOP design pattern. The problem with doing that kind of static abuse is that you're no longer passing the instance like you claimed you were, but you are getting the instance which no longer follows OOP data communication conventions that is supposed to occur between objects.
Very true, however, please remember, I never said it was an object oriented design pattern. It's simply a design pattern used to pass around instances. It goes against what object oriented programming practice goes for, obviously, but it's still a design pattern, now whether it's recommended to be used in a language that promotes OOP? No, no it's not. Can it be used? Yes, yes it can. Should it be done? Depends on the use-case.
I don't think you understand what static does. You're not passing any instances with a static getter. It's a design pattern that strictly goes against the OOP design pattern. Even if it only went against what OOP went for, it would still be unconventional as you are writing in an OOP language. There are no buts or valid use-cases, you shouldn't use it if you actually want to write properly in OOP conventions even if you can.
..yes. That's what I've been saying the whole time. But the singleton pattern is a design pattern, regardless of it not being object oriented.
Right? Fuck object oriented practice. Going against convention rules, it looks "cleaner"(very subjective).You dog shit developers think I’m abusing static because I store the instance to the main plugin class in a static context instead of passing around the same reference wherever I need it. The technique is widely used and has no performance implications... Just more clean imo.
Most of you retards believe that your code style is the best way to code and that other techniques can’t be used. You will never have a future in programming thinking like that. You won’t have a future in programming anyways because you think you’re so high and mighty when in reality you 3 fags blow cock when it comes to java and suck each other off to make yourselves look better. It doesn’t work
Also, throwback to you not knowing how generics work LMAO
also, you're left to talk about other people's future in programming? aren't you a skid? back off lmao. your only resort is "fags" "gay" "mentally unstable" "retarded" "autistic" etc. Grow up.
Last edited:
throwback to your praxi stream i watched for five minutes to realize how shit you are when it comes to generics LOL
also.. no. holding singletons within static is against general object oriented practice. But, I don't care about it as much, it's a design pattern, doesn't bother anyone, achieves the same thing any other pattern will either way.
yeah, cause it's the lazy way out, and taught me what? You can't properly handle player wrappers lol.
Are you just going to ignore Alex saying that you've been recycling his code for around 8 months
MCM reputation means literally nothing.
You.. don't know what wrappers are..?The lazy way out? You’re extremely stupid. And player wrappers, what the fuck are you even talking about? Lol
I already handled it with him in telegram PMs. He claimed I used his queue code, I claimed I didn’t. Alex thinks everyone uses his code, so I don’t acknowledge it anymore. He’s a troll
No. You clearly don't.
Also, someone just told me that by getting the invalid session error(usually when you log into a premium server with a cracked account or something of the sort) the entire ragespigot crashes, /shrug
Which class is a wrapper for Player?
- Status
