it is 4x more dangerous than the flu, it's infected 531,708 people and killed 24,053, sure 122,203 people have recovered, but that's a 4.5% death rate off those stats . it is much more dangerous than the flu, it may not affect say people of younger ages as much but it is still very bad, it's worth the reaction. we shouldn't be panicking but in my country the US people are acting as if it's nothing bad, now we're #1 in cases. even if you won't suffer bad from it think of all the people who will and how it will effect the hospitals and the economy. it is something not to be taken lightly
It really depends from person to person. Your overall state of health at the time of your infection will dictate how bad it is. If you are a chronically ill or immunocompromised individual you are much more likely to suffer to critical effects of the virus such as Acute respiratory distress syndrome. However if you are aged between lets say 8-50, more than likely symptoms will present themselves in the form of a mild-moderate flu and will likely pass within a week or so.Is Coronavirus that bad ?
Are they really though? There are no “true” treatment methods to combat any virus, many of which are highly lethal. It always boils down to the same thing: pumping fluids into your body and hoping your immune system can win.That, and there not being a tested and true treatment method yet, though many are in development worldwide.
